Cited by 25Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

The efficiency model of support and the creation of digital apothecaries.

Muñoz, Ricardo F.·2017·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cpsp.12174

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using human supporters limits how widely an intervention can be scaled because of care costs and limited supporter availability.

    “the inclusion of human supporters reduces intervention scalability due to the cost of providing care and limited availability of supporters (20).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muñoz, R. F.
Affiliations
Palo Alto University (US)
Corresponding author
Muñoz, Ricardo F.
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2017-03
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
46-49
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W2549873783
Cited by
25
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
digital health interventions, telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review