Cited by 326Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health Interventions

Prevention of major depression

Muñoz, Ricardo F., Cuijpers, Pim, Smit, Filip, Barrera, Alinne Z., Leykin, Yan·2010·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Before the 1980s, no randomized controlled trials had been carried out to test whether major depressive episodes could be prevented. In the past 30 years, several trials have reported success in reducing the incidence (the number of new cases) of major depressive episodes. These studies suggest that major depression can be prevented. Given the large burden of disease caused by major depression, it is time for substantial systematic efforts to replicate these studies, carry out multisite trials, and widely disseminate prevention interventions found to be effective. The present review examines the conceptual and practical differences between treatment and prevention trials and the importance of identifying groups at high short-term risk for major depressive episodes to make prevention trials feasible. We also list the randomized controlled prevention trials that have been carried out to date and discuss the need for prevention interventions that go beyond the limits of traditional face-to-face interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-033109-132040

Cites

165 of 165 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muñoz, R. F., Cuijpers, P., Smit, F., Barrera, A. Z., & Leykin, Y.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Palo Alto University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
181-212
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2120806935
Cited by
326
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 26
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH019391, F32 MH07771)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
major depressive disorder, depression prevention, randomized controlled trials, prevention trials, treatment trials, high-risk groups, replication, multisite trials, intervention dissemination, face-to-face intervention
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Health Promotion, Humans, Incidence, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review