Cited by 211Digital Mental Health InterventionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Integrating human support into behavioral intervention technologies: The efficiency model of support.

Schueller, Stephen M., Tomasino, Kathryn Noth, Mohr, David C.·2017·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0101740

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schueller, S. M., Tomasino, K. N., & Mohr, D. C.
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2017-03
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
27-45
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W4240249117
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
human support, human-technology interaction, technology-based interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review