Cited by 226Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Historic and prehistoric human-driven extinctions have reshaped global mammal diversity patterns

Open access
Faurby, S., Svenning, J.-C.·2015·Diversity and Distributions

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Aim To assess the extent to which humans have reshaped Earth's biodiversity, by estimating natural ranges of all late Quaternary mammalian species, and to compare diversity patterns based on these with diversity patterns based on current distributions. Location Globally. Methods We estimated species, functional and phylogenetic diversity patterns based on natural ranges of all mammalian species (n = 5747 species) as they could have been today in the complete absence of human influence through time. Following this, we compared macroecological analyses of current and natural diversity patterns to assess whether human-induced range changes bias evolutionary and ecological analyses based on current diversity patterns. Results We find that current diversity patterns have been drastically modified by humans, mostly due to global extinctions and regional to local extirpations. Current and natural diversities exhibit marked deviations virtually everywhere outside sub-Saharan Africa. These differences are strongest for terrestrial megafauna, but also important for all mammals combined. The human-induced changes led to biases in estimates of environmental diversity drivers, especially for terrestrial megafauna, but also for all mammals combined. Main conclusions Our results show that fundamental diversity patterns have been reshaped by human-driven extinctions and extirpations, highlighting humans as a major force in the Earth system. We thereby emphasize that estimating natural distributions and diversities is important to improve our understanding of the evolutionary and ecological drivers of diversity as well as for providing a benchmark for conservation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ddi.12369

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On average, large terrestrial mammals have been extirpated from 75% of their natural ranges.

    “On average, large terrestrial mammals have been extirpated from 75% of their natural ranges ( 40 )”

    From Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change (2019) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Range modifications section (page unavailable) reports 67,306 current versus 242,960 estimated natural grid-cell occurrences for terrestrial megafauna, implying a loss of about 72%. The Estimated diversity section defines megafauna as over 44.5 kg, distinct from its larger-than-10-kg ‘large terrestrial species’ group. The paper therefore supports substantial range loss, but these pooled occurrences do not establish that large terrestrial mammals have, on average, lost 75% of their natural ranges. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
  2. Darwin, C. (1859) The Origin of Species. John Murray, London. certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not this version posted April 1, 2015. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/017368 doi: bioRxiv preprint · DOI
  3. certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not this version posted April 1, 2015. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/017368 doi: bioRxiv preprint · DOI
  4. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. by Stocker, T.F., et al.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  5. certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not this version posted April 1, 2015. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/017368 doi: bioRxiv preprint · DOI
  6. certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not this version posted April 1, 2015. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/017368 doi: bioRxiv preprint · DOI
  7. certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not this version posted April 1, 2015. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/017368 doi: bioRxiv preprint · DOI
  8. certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not this version posted April 1, 2015. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/017368 doi: bioRxiv preprint · DOI
  9. certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not this version posted April 1, 2015. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/017368 doi: bioRxiv preprint · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faurby, S., & Svenning, J.-C.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Faurby, S.
Venue
Diversity and Distributions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-20
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1155-1166
ISSN
  • 0967-9952 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-9516
OpenAlex
W2952883628
Cited by
226
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8
FWCI
20.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diversity and Distributions (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Research Council (ERC-2012-StG-310886-HISTFUNC)
  • Danish Natural Science Research Council (#11-115750, #4090-00227)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
human-driven extinction, mammal diversity, extirpation, functional diversity, phylogenetic diversity, human impact on biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review