The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing Imbalanced Supply Chain Relationships for Sustainability: A Power Perspective
Open accessAbstract
This study adopts a power perspective to investigate sustainable supply chain relationships and specifically uses resource‐dependence theory (RDT) to critically analyze buyer–supplier–supplier relationships. Empirical evidence is provided, extending the RDT model in this context. The concept of power relationships is explored through a qualitative study of a multinational company and agricultural growers in the UK food industry that work together to implement sustainable practices. We look at multiple triadic relationships involving a large buyer and its small suppliers to investigate how relative power affects the implementation of sustainable supply‐management practices. The study highlights that power as dependence is relevant to understanding compliance in sustainable supply chains and to identifying appropriate relationship‐management strategies to build more sustainable supply chains. We show the influences of power on how players manage their relationships and how it affects organizational responses to the implementation of sustainability initiatives. Power notably influences the sharing of sustainability‐related risks and value between supply chain partners. From a managerial perspective, the study contributes to developing a better understanding of how power can become an effective way to achieve sustainability goals. This article offers insights into the way in which a large organization works with small and medium size enterprises to implement sustainable practices and shows how power management—that is, the way in which power is used—can support or hinder effective cooperation around sustainability in the supply chain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business
Elkington, J. (1998) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106 · Cited by 5,341 · cited 1×
“Their definition builds upon the triple-bottom-line view of sustainability (Elkington, 1998), which conceptualizes organizational performance as the management of not only economic but also environmental and social capital.”
BackgroundYin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Aberdeen, T. (2013) · The Canadian Journal of Action Research · doi:10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73 · Cited by 3,250
PAULRAJ, A. (2011) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2010.03212.x · Cited by 712
THINKING DIFFERENTLY ABOUT PURCHASING PORTFOLIOS: AN ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE SOURCING
PAGELL, M., WU, Z., & WASSERMAN, M. E. (2010) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03186.x · Cited by 411
KRAUSE, D. R., VACHON, S., & KLASSEN, R. D. (2009) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03173.x · Cited by 399
Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: public sector perspectives
Walker, H., & Preuss, L. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.014 · Cited by 270
Self-citationCAPITALISM, DEVELOPMENT AND GLOBAL COMMODITY CHAINS
Gereffi, G. (2010) · CAPITALISM AND DEVELOPMENT · doi:10.4324/9780203201961_chapter_11 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Blockchain technology: implications for operations and supply chain management
Cole, R., Stevenson, M., & Aitken, J. (2019) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-09-2018-0309 · Cited by 958
Pandemics and Supply Chain Management Research: Toward a Theoretical Toolbox*
Craighead, C. W., Ketchen, D. J., & Darby, J. L. (2020) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/deci.12468 · Cited by 445
International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management
Stock, J. (1990) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/eum0000000001081 · Cited by 338
Sharma, M., Luthra, S., Joshi, S., & Kumar, A. (2022) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2020.1810213 · Cited by 283
Maximising “Community Benefits” in public procurement: tensions and trade-offs
Wontner, K. L., Walker, H., Harris, I., & Lynch, J. (2020) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-05-2019-0395 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Touboulic, A., Chicksand, D., & Walker, H.
- Venue
- Decision Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 577-619
- ISSN
- 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5915
- OpenAlex
- W2104396063
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 52.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing Imbalanced Supply Chain Relationships for Sustainability: A Power Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/deci.12087
- The paper
- Touboulic, A., Chicksand, D., & Walker, H. (2014). Managing Imbalanced Supply Chain Relationships for Sustainability: A Power Perspective. Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.