Cited by 64Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementPublic Policy and Administration Research

Maximising “Community Benefits” in public procurement: tensions and trade-offs

Wontner, Karen Lorraine, Walker, Helen, Harris, Irina, Lynch, Jane·2020·International Journal of Operations & Production Management

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to illuminate the challenges involved in implementing community benefits (CBs), a sustainable public procurement policy that ensures that there are positive social and economic outcomes for the local community when public money is spent on goods, works and services. Design/methodology/approach Interviews and focus groups were conducted with public sector buyers and suppliers in Wales with experience in implementing CBs. Resource dependence theory was used to examine the extent to which dependence on resources effects CBs implementation. Findings Whilst the study confirms that implementation of CBs improves economic and social outcomes, there can also be challenges for public sector organisations and their constituent supply chains. These include tensions between CBs and other policies, differing views between buyers and suppliers, and the unintended consequences of promoting one form of CBs over another. Research limitations/implications The research found that Welsh Government influences the buyer-supplier dyad through regulatory and financial power. We elaborate on resource dependency theory by adding four constructs (powerful stakeholders, intra and inter organisational issues, challenges and enablers) to better understand the flows of power and resources in this research context. Practical implications Buyer and supplier practitioners and policymakers may find the factors leading to successful CBs implementation useful, such as ensuring closer comm…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijopm-05-2019-0395

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wontner, K. L., Walker, H., Harris, I., & Lynch, J.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-10-03
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
1909-1939
ISSN
0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3090091956
Cited by
64
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Operations & Production Management (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
community benefits, public procurement, resource dependence theory, power and resources, policy implementation, socio-economic sustainability, supply chain, Wales, Welsh Government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review