Cited by 114Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsWorkplace Health and Well-beingStress Responses and Cortisol

Perceived stress and incidence of Type 2 diabetes: a 35‐year follow‐up study of middle‐aged Swedish men

Novak, M., Björck, L., Giang, K. W., Heden‐Ståhl, C., Wilhelmsen, L., Rosengren, A.·2013·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aim: To explore incident cases of diagnosed diabetes over 35 years of follow‐up in relation to self‐perceived stress at baseline. Methods: This was a population‐based random sample of 7251 men derived from the Primary Prevention Trial Study, aged 47–56 years at baseline and without prior history of diabetes, coronary heart disease and stroke. Incident diabetes was identified from hospital discharge and death registries as principal or secondary diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the potential association between stress and diabetes. Results: During a 35‐year follow‐up, a total of 899 men were identified with diabetes. The crude incidence was 5.2 per 1000 persons‐years. At baseline, 15.5% men reported permanent stress related to conditions at work or home. After adjusting for age and competing risk of death, the estimated 35‐year conditional probability of diabetes in men with permanent stress was 42.6%, compared with 31.0% for those with periodic stress and 31.2% with no stress. In age‐adjusted Cox regression analysis, men with permanent stress had a higher risk of diabetes [hazard ratio 1.52 (95% CI 1.26–1.82)] compared with men with no (referent) or periodic stress [hazard ratio 1.09 (95% CI 0.94–1.27)]. The association between stress and diabetes was slightly attenuated but remained significant after adjustment for age, socio‐economic status, physical inactivity, BMI , systolic blood pressure and use of anti‐hypertensive medication [hazard ratio 1.45 (95% CI 1.20–1.75)]. When examining principal diagnosis of diabetes cases separately from secondary diagnoses cases, the excess risk of diabetes associated with permanent stress remained significant both in age (only) and multivariable adjusted models. Conclusion: Self‐perceived permanent stress is an important long‐term predictor of diagnosed diabetes, independently of socio‐economic status, BMI and other conventional Type 2 diabetes risk factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.12037

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between perceived stress and T2DM varies by sex or socioeconomic status in some studies.

    “However, this association has been shown in some studies to vary by sex or socioeconomic status (as measured by occupational status), which indicates that these factors might moderate this relationship.”
  • A link exists between perceived stress and development of T2DM.

    “Considering the evidence as a whole, a link seems to exist between perceived stress and development of T2DM.”
  • In Swedish men (n=7,251; n=899 incident cases of diabetes mellitus; 35-year follow-up), perceived permanent stress (self-reported stress related to work or home life ongoing for >1 year) was associated with incident diabetes mellitus (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26-1.82).

    “Swedish men ( n = 7,251; n = 899 incident cases of diabetes mellitus; 35 year follow-up) | Perceived permanent stress (self-reported stress related to work or home life ongoing for >1 year) | *HR 1.52 (95% CI 1.26-1.82).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Novak, M., Björck, L., Giang, K. W., Heden‐Ståhl, C., Wilhelmsen, L., & Rosengren, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine the Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
Corresponding author
Novak, M.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-13
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
e8-16
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W1983257463
Cited by
114
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
perceived stress, type 2 diabetes, diabetes incidence, periodic stress, middle-aged men, long-term risk prediction, socioeconomic status, body mass index, hypertension, physical inactivity
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Sweden, Body Mass Index, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review