Cited by 595Diabetes Management and ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and Education

Barriers to Physical Activity Among Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Brazeau, Anne-Sophie, Rabasa-Lhoret, Rémi, Strychar, Irene, Mircescu, Hortensia·2008·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To determine, in an adult population with type 1 diabetes, barriers to regular physical activity using a diabetes-specific barriers measure (the Barriers to Physical Activity in Diabetes [type 1] [BAPAD1] scale) and factors associated with these barriers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—One hundred adults with type 1 diabetes answered a questionnaire assessing perceived barriers to physical activity and related factors. A1C was obtained from the medical chart of each individual. RESULTS—Fear of hypoglycemia was identified as being the strongest barrier to physical activity. Greater knowledge about insulin pharmacokinetics and using appropriate approaches to minimize exercise-induced hypoglycemia were factors associated with fewer perceived barriers. Greater barriers were positively correlated with A1C levels (r = 0.203; P = 0.042) and negatively with well-being (r = −0.45; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS—Fear of hypoglycemia is the strongest barrier to regular physical activity in adults with type 1 diabetes, who should therefore be informed and supported in hypoglycemia management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc08-0720

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brazeau, A.-S., Rabasa-Lhoret, R., Strychar, I., & Mircescu, H.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Metabolic Dysfunction Laboratory, Department of Nutrition, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
Corresponding author
Mircescu, Hortensia
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2008-11-01
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
2108-2109
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2112181364
Cited by
595
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 24
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, physical activity, barriers to exercise, fear of hypoglycemia, exercise-induced hypoglycemia, insulin pharmacokinetics, glycemic control, HbA1c, well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review