Cited by 33Diabetes Management and EducationBehavioral Health and InterventionsDiabetes Management and Research

The DAFNE plus programme for sustained type 1 diabetes self management: Intervention development using the Behaviour Change Wheel

Open access
Stanton‐Fay, Stephanie H., Hamilton, Kathryn, Chadwick, Paul M., Lorencatto, Fabiana, Gianfrancesco, Carla, de Zoysa, Nicole, Coates, Elizabeth, Cooke, Debbie +4 more·2021·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

AIMS: Self-management programmes for type 1 diabetes, such as the UK's Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE), improve short-term clinical outcomes but difficulties maintaining behavioural changes attenuate long-term impact. This study used the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework to revise the DAFNE intervention to support sustained behaviour change. METHODS: A four-step method was based on the BCW intervention development approach: (1) Identifying self-management behaviours and barriers/enablers to maintain them via stakeholder consultation and evidence synthesis, and mapping barriers/enablers to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model. (2) Specifying behaviour change techniques (BCTs) in the existing DAFNE intervention using the Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy (BCTTv1). (3) Identifying additional BCTs to target the barriers/enablers using the BCW and BCTTv1. (4) Parallel stakeholder consultation to generate recommendations for intervention revision. Revised materials were co-designed by stakeholders (diabetologists, psychologists, specialist nurses and dieticians). RESULTS: In all, 34 barriers and 5 enablers to sustaining self-management post-DAFNE were identified. The existing DAFNE intervention contained 24 BCTs, which partially addressed the enablers. In all, 27 BCTs were added, including 'Habit formation', 'Credible source' and 'Conserving mental resources'. In total, 15 stakeholder-agreed recommendations for content and delivery were incorporated into the final DAFNEplus intervention, comprising three co-designed components: (1) face-to-face group learning course, (2) individual structured follow-up sessions and (3) technological support, including blood glucose data management. CONCLUSIONS: This method provided a systematic approach to specifying and revising a behaviour change intervention incorporating stakeholder input. The revised DAFNEplus intervention aims to support the maintenance of behavioural changes by targeting barriers and enablers to sustaining self-management behaviours.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.14548

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teaching people with diabetes to balance insulin use and carbohydrate intake and physical activity are necessary, but these strategies are not always sufficient for prevention.

    “Teaching people with diabetes to balance insulin use and carbohydrate intake and physical activity are necessary, but these strategies are not always sufficient for prevention (77,(103)(104)(105).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mansell P. The Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) ed- ucation programme. J Diabetes Nurs. 2012;16(9):364-369.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stanton‐Fay, S. H., Hamilton, K., Chadwick, P. M., Lorencatto, F., Gianfrancesco, C., de Zoysa, N., Coates, E., Cooke, D., McBain, H., Heller, S. R., Michie, S., & the DAFNEplus study group
Affiliations
  • Clinical, Health and Educational Psychology/Centre for Behaviour Change University College London London United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • University College London (GB)
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Diabetes Centre King’s College Hospital London United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • City, University of London (GB)
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-10
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
e14548-e14548
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W3133222905
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Programme Grants for Applied Research (RP‐PG‐0514‐20013)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, diabetes self-management, Behaviour Change Wheel, COM-B model, behaviour change techniques, intervention development, maintenance of behaviour change, barriers and facilitators, co-design, stakeholder consultation, habit formation
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Support Systems, Self-Management, Behavior Therapy, Communication Barriers, Delivery of Health Care, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Motivation, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review