Cited by 29Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Liraglutide changes body composition and lowers added sugar intake in overweight persons with insulin pump-treated type 1 diabetes

Open access
Schmidt, Signe, Frandsen, Christian S., Dejgaard, Thomas F., Vistisen, Dorte, Halldórsson, Thórhallur, Olsen, Sjudur F., Jensen, Jens‐Erik B., Madsbad, Sten +2 more·2022·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aims: To present secondary outcome analyses of liraglutide treatment in overweight adults with insulin pump‐treated type 1 diabetes (T1D), focusing on changes in body composition and dimensions, and to evaluate changes in food intake to identify potential dietary drivers of liraglutide‐associated weight loss. Materials and methods: A 26‐week randomized placebo‐controlled study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of liraglutide 1.8 mg daily in 44 overweight adults with insulin pump‐treated T1D and glucose levels above target, and demonstrated significant glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)‐ and body weight‐reducing effects. For secondary outcome analysis, dual X‐ray absorptiometry scans were completed at Weeks 0 and 26, and questionnaire‐based food frequency recordings were obtained at Weeks 0, 13 and 26 to characterize liraglutide‐induced changes in body composition and food intake. Results: Total fat and lean body mass decreased in liraglutide‐treated participants (fat mass −4.6 kg [95% confidence interval {CI} −5.7; −3.5], P < 0.001; lean mass −2.5 kg [95% CI −3.2;‐1.7], P < 0.001), but remained stable in placebo‐treated participants (fat mass −0.3 kg [95% CI −1.3;0.8], P = 0.604; lean mass 0.0 kg [95% CI −0.7;0.7]; P = 0.965 [between‐group P values <0.001]). Participants reduced their energy intake numerically more in the liraglutide arm (−1.1 MJ [95% CI −2.0;‐0.02], P = 0.02) than in the placebo arm (−0.9 MJ [95% CI −2.0;0.1], P = 0.22), but the between‐group difference was statistically insignificant ( P = 0.42). However, energy derived from added sugars decreased by 27% in the liraglutide arm compared with an increase of 14% in the placebo arm ( P = 0.004). Conclusions: Liraglutide lowered fat and lean body mass compared with placebo. Further, liraglutide reduced intake of added sugars. However, no significant difference in total daily energy intake was detected between liraglutide‐ and placebo‐treated participants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.14567

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 26-week trial of liraglutide 1.8 mg in 44 individuals with type 1 diabetes and overweight or obesity, fat mass decreased 14.1% (4.6 kg) and lean mass decreased 4.7% (2.5 kg).

    “Corroborating these findings, a clinical trial in 44 individuals with type 1 diabetes and overweight or obesity revealed a fat mass loss of 14.1% (À4.6 kg) after a 26-week Lira (1.8 mg) treatment and a significant LM loss of 4.7% (À2.5 kg) (32).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, S., Frandsen, C. S., Dejgaard, T. F., Vistisen, D., Halldórsson, T., Olsen, S. F., Jensen, J. B., Madsbad, S., Andersen, H. U., & Nørgaard, K.
Affiliations
  • Frederiksberg Hospital (DK)
  • Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
  • Gentofte Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Health Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland
  • Department of Epidemiology Research Statens Serum Institut Copenhagen Denmark
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Signe
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-17
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
212-220
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W3204555065
Cited by
29
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Dexcom
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (SDCC 3. B Epidemiology)
  • Gedeon Richter
  • Novo Nordisk
  • UCB Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
liraglutide, type 1 diabetes, insulin pump therapy, overweight, body composition, fat mass, lean body mass, added sugar intake, energy intake, weight loss, GLP-1 receptor agonists, HbA1c, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, food frequency questionnaire
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Sugars, Adult, Body Composition, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Overweight, Insulins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review