Cited by 16Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiovascular prevention with glucose‐lowering drugs in type 2 diabetes: An evidence‐based approach to the categories of primary and secondary prevention

Open access
Mannucci, Edoardo, Silverii, Giovanni Antonio·2023·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

AIMS: Whether to recommend specifically the glucose-lowering therapies with cardiovascular benefit only in secondary prevention, or also in patients with multiple risk factors (MRF) but without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), is controversial across the guidelines for diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of clinical trials with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as an outcome. RESULTS: The definitions of ASCVD and MRF were heterogeneous across trials; nevertheless, the incidence of MACE was 2.8-fold higher in people with ASCVD in trials with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), and 3.9-fold in trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA). Both SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of MACE in people with previous ASCVD [inverse variance-odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval (0.86: 0.97) for SGLT2i, Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval (0.81: 0.90) for GLP-1 RA], whereas no significant reduction was detected in those without; on the other hand, no significant difference in effect was found between the two groups as well. The sample of patients without ASCVD enrolled in clinical trials is insufficient to draw reliable conclusions in this population; however, even assuming the same benefit detected in people with ASCVD also in those with MRF, the number needed to treat would differ (35 for secondary, 99 for primary prevention of a MACE with a SGLT2i; 21 for secondary, 82 for primary prevention with a GLP-1 RA, respectively), given the difference in absolute cardiovascular risk at baseline. CONCLUSION: The distinction between patients with ASCVD and those without ASCVD and MRF appears therefore justified by available evidence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.15226

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1111/dom.14888 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.numecd.2022.01.027 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s00125‐022‐05787‐2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0140‐6736(18)32261‐X · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1056/NEJMoa1509225 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1612917 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1056/NEJMoa1901118 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/S0140‐6736(19)31149‐3 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1056/NEJMoa2108269 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S0140‐6736(05)67528‐9 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1001/jama.299.13.1561 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Rosner B, 2010, Fundamentals of Biostatistics
  17. 10.2337/dcS15‐3024 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0140‐6736(03)12948‐0 · DOI
  19. AirdWC.Phenotypic heterogeneity of the endothelium: II. Representative vascular beds circulation research.2007;100:174‐190. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000255690.03436.ae · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.2003510117 · DOI
  21. 10.1152/physrev.00022.2020 · DOI
  22. 10.1161/01.STR.0000257974.06317.49 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm529 · DOI
  24. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.957332 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mannucci, E., & Silverii, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Silverii, Giovanni Antonio
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-02
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
3435-3443
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W4385476384
Cited by
16
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease prevention, major adverse cardiovascular events, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, multiple risk factors, primary prevention, secondary prevention, number needed to treat, cardiovascular risk stratification
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucose, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Atherosclerosis, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review