Cited by 60Cancer survivorship and careResilience and Mental HealthOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The influence of self-efficacy and resilient coping on cancer patients’ quality of life

Open access
Hinz, Andreas, Friedrich, Michael, Kuhnt, Susanne, Zenger, Markus, Schulte, Thomas·2019·European Journal of Cancer Care

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyse whether general self-efficacy and resilient coping are negatively impacted when people are sick with cancer (compared with people from the general population), and whether these resource variables predict quality of life outcomes in that patient group. A sample of 959 patients recruited in an oncologic rehabilitation clinic was examined once while hospitalised and once again six months thereafter. The outcome variables were quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and distress (PHQ-4). The resource variables were self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale) and resilient coping (Brief Resilient Coping Scale). Representative samples of the general population served as controls. Self-efficacy (d = 0.08) and resilient coping (d = 0.28) were only slightly lower in the patients' sample than in the general population. Both resource variables were associated with quality of life, but self-efficacy (and not resilient coping) was the only independent predictor of quality of life functioning scales and distress scores when the baseline values of the dependent variables were also taken into account. Strengthening patients' belief in their own ability to cope with the disease may help them retain and/or regain a higher level of quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ecc.12952

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]34. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinz, A., Friedrich, M., Kuhnt, S., Zenger, M., & Schulte, T.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • Klinik Bad Oexen (DE)
Corresponding author
Hinz, Andreas
Venue
European Journal of Cancer Care
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-18
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
e12952
ISSN
0961-5423 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896114136
Cited by
60
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Krebshilfe (70112267)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
self-efficacy, resilient coping, cancer patients, quality of life, psychological distress, EORTC QLQ-C30, PHQ-4, coping with illness
MeSH terms
Patient Health Questionnaire, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Self Efficacy, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review