Cited by 1,127Education, Achievement, and GiftednessPersonality Traits and PsychologyOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: evidence from five countries

Luszczynska, Aleksandra, Gutiérrez‐Doña, Benicio, Schwarzer, Ralf·2005·International Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Based on social-cognitive theory (Bandura, 1997), this paper examined whether perceived self-efficacy is a universal psychological construct that accounts for variance within various domains of human functioning. Perceived self-efficacy is not only of a task-specific nature, but it can also be identified at a more general level of functioning. General self-efficacy (GSE) is the belief in one’s competence to tackle novel tasks and to cope with adversity in a broad range of stressful or challenging encounters, as opposed to specific self-efficacy, which is constrained to a particular task at hand. The study aimed at exploring the relations between GSE and a variety of other psychological constructs across several countries. Relations between general self-efficacy and personality, well-being, stress appraisals, social relations, and achievements were examined among 8796 participants from Costa Rica, Germany, Poland, Turkey, and the USA. Across countries, the findings provide evidence for associations between perceived general self-efficacy and the selected variables. The highest positive associations were with optimism, self-regulation, and self-esteem, whereas the highest negative associations emerged with depression and anxiety. Academic performance is also associated with self-efficacy as hypothesized. The replication across languages or cultures adds significance to these findings. The relations between self-efficacy and other personality measures remained stable across cultures and samples. Thus, perceived general self-efficacy appears to be a universal construct that yields meaningful relations with other psychological constructs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207590444000041

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Want conflicts and motivational interference are negatively related to self-regulation, while self-efficacy is strongly associated with self-regulation.

    “Both want conflicts and motivational interference are negatively related to self-regulation (Fries et al., 2008; Grund and Fries, 2014), while self-efficacy is strongly associated with self-regulation (Luszczynska et al., 2005).”

    From Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment (2022) · cites this paper as Luszczynska et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez‐Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R.
Venue
International Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
80-89
ISSN
  • 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-066X
OpenAlex
W2153318572
Cited by
1,127
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 66
FWCI
18.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
general self-efficacy, cross-cultural universality, optimism, self-regulation, self-esteem, depression, anxiety, academic performance, personality, well-being, stress appraisal, interpersonal relationships, social cognitive theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review