Cited by 51Income, Poverty, and InequalityPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionQuality of Life Measurement

Inequality OF subjective well-being as a comprehensive measure OF inequality

Open access
Goff, Leonard, Helliwell, John F., Mayraz, Guy·2018·Economic Inquiry

Abstract

The link between happiness and overall inequality is best studied using an index that incorporates different aspects of inequality, and is measured consistently in different countries. One such index is the degree to which happiness itself varies among individuals. Its correlation with both happiness levels and social trust is substantially stronger than the corresponding correlation for income inequality. This remains so after allowing for bounded scale reporting, including a purely ordinal measure of dispersion. Moreover, the correlation is stronger for individuals who profess to care most about inequality. The link between happiness and inequality may thus be stronger than previously appreciated. (JEL I31, D6, D63, D31)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ecin.12582

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harsanyi, J. (1955). Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and the interper- sonal comparison of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 63, 309-321.
  2. Goff, L., Helliwell, J. F. & Mayraz, G. (2018). Inequality of subjective well-being as a comprehensive measure of inequality. Economic Inquiry, 56 (4), pp.2177-2194. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12582. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/214366 File Description: Accepted version

Authors
Goff, L., Helliwell, J. F., & Mayraz, G.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Goff, Leonard
  • Helliwell, John F.
  • Mayraz, Guy
Venue
Economic Inquiry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-04
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
2177-2194
ISSN
  • 0043-3640 (ISSN-L)
  • 0095-2583
  • 1465-7295
OpenAlex
W2803097171
Cited by
51
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Economic Inquiry (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
subjective well-being, happiness, inequality, inequality indices, social trust, income inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review