Cited by 6Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

The genetic determination of alternate stages in polyphenic insects

Open access
Erezyilmaz, Deniz·2024·Evolution & Development

Abstract

Molt-based transitions in form are a central feature of insect life that have enabled adaptation to diverse and changing environments. The endocrine regulation of these transitions is well established, but an understanding of their genetic regulation has only recently emerged from insect models. The pupal and adult stages of metamorphosing insects are determined by the stage specifying transcription factors broad-complex (br) and Ecdysone inducible protein 93 (E93), respectively. A probable larval determinant, chronologically inappropriate metamorphosis (chinmo), has just recently been characterized. Expression of these three transcription factors in the metamorphosing insects is regulated by juvenile hormone with ecdysteroid hormones, and by mutual repression between the stage-specific transcription factors. This review explores the hypothesis that variations in the onset, duration, and tissue-specific expression of chinmo, br, and E93 underlie other polyphenisms that have arisen throughout insects, including the castes of social insects, aquatic stages of mayflies, and the neoteny of endoparasites. The mechanisms that constrain how chinmo, br, and E93 expression may vary will also constrain the ways that insect life history may evolve. I find that four types of expression changes are associated with novel insect forms: (1) heterochronic shift in the turnover of expression, (2) expansion or contraction of expression, (3) tissue-specific expression, and (4) redeployment of st…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ede.12485

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparison of the relationship of the key metamorphic genes within the Holometabola shows that their interactions can be modified to enable different life history strategies.

    “Comparison of the relationship of the key metamorphic genes within the Holometabola shows that their inter­ actions can be modified to enable different life history strategies [14].”

    From Regulation of metamorphosis in holometabolous insects (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erezyilmaz, D.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Erezyilmaz, Deniz
Venue
Evolution & Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-06-12
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
e12485-e12485
ISSN
  • 1520-541X (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-142X
OpenAlex
W4399614066
Cited by
6
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evolution & Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Keywords
polyphenism, insect metamorphosis, molting, Chinmo, Broad-Complex, E93, juvenile hormone, ecdysteroids, transcription factors, caste evolution, neoteny, heterochrony, life history evolution, tissue-specific gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Insecta, Juvenile Hormones, Larva, Metamorphosis, Biological, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Insect Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review