Cited by 122Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchHemiptera Insect Studies

The pupal specifier broad directs progressive morphogenesis in a direct-developing insect

Open access
Erezyilmaz, Deniz F., Riddiford, Lynn M., Truman, James W.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A key regulatory gene in metamorphosing (holometabolous) insect life histories is the transcription factor broad ( br ), which specifies pupal development. To determine the role of br in a direct-developing (hemimetabolous) insect that lacks a pupal stage, we cloned br from the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus ( Of’br ). We find that, unlike metamorphosing insects, in which br expression is restricted to the larval–pupal transition, Of’br mRNA is expressed during embryonic development and is maintained at each nymphal molt but then disappears at the molt to the adult. Induction of a supernumerary nymphal stage with a juvenile hormone (JH) mimic prevented the disappearance of br mRNA. In contrast, induction of a precocious adult molt by application of precocene II to third-stage nymphs caused a loss of br mRNA at the precocious adult molt. Thus, JH is necessary to maintain br expression during the nymphal stages. Injection of Of’br dsRNA into either early third- or fourth-stage nymphs caused a repetition of stage-specific pigmentation patterns and prevented the normal anisometric growth of the wing pads without affecting isometric growth or molting. Therefore, br is necessary for the mutable (heteromorphic) changes that occur during hemimetabolous development. Our results suggest that metamorphosis in insects arose as expression of br , which conveys competence for change, became restricted to one postembryonic instar. After this shift in br expression, the progressive changes that occur within the nymphal series in basal insects became compressed to the one short period of morphogenesis seen in the larva-to-pupa transition of holometabolous insects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0509983103

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In hemimetabolous insects, br expression occurs at each nymphal moult, except between the last nymphal stage and the adult.

    “In hemimetabolous insects, br expression occurs at each nymphal moult, except between the last nymphal stage and the adult (Erezyilmaz et al. , 2006).”

    From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Erezyilmaz et al., 2006

    The Results report that br mRNA rises at nymphal molts but is absent during formation of the adult cuticle in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus. The claim extends that finding to hemimetabolous insects generally, whereas the paper’s direct evidence is for this species. No page numbers are supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Broad knockdown nymphs maintain the color pattern displayed at the time of the knockdown through the remaining nymphal instars.

    “Broad knockdown nymphs maintain the color pattern displayed at the time of the knockdown through the remaining nymphal instars [16,43].”

    From Regulation of metamorphosis in holometabolous insects (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results and Fig. 2 caption report that early fourth-instar knockdown produced fifth-instar nymphs with fourth-instar pigmentation, and that some third-instar knockdown nymphs resembled third instars after their next molt. They do not establish that the color pattern present at knockdown persists through all remaining nymphal instars: other third-instar knockdown nymphs molted to normal fourth instars before producing altered fifth instars. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In holometabolous insects the expression of chinmo and broad is separated, with Chinmo directing the early proliferative expansion of the primordium, followed by Broad directing its morphogenesis into a pupal wing.

    “The expression of these two genes is separated in the holometabolous insects, with Chinmo directing the early proliferative expansion of the primordium, followed by Broad directing its morphogenesis into a pupal wing.”

    From Regulation of metamorphosis in holometabolous insects (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Abstract and Discussion describe Broad expression at the larval–pupal transition and its role in morphogenesis in holometabolous insects. Our copy does not mention Chinmo or establish that Chinmo first drives proliferative expansion of a wing primordium, so it does not support the proposed sequence of the two genes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In cockroaches and bugs, broad is expressed through the nymphal series in a temporal fashion very similar to chinmo.

    “Studies in both cockroaches [21] and bugs [33,16,43] showed that broad is expressed through the nymphal series in a temporal fashion very similar to chinmo (Figure 4a)”

    From Regulation of metamorphosis in holometabolous insects (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results (page not provided) show that broad mRNA is present across the milkweed bug’s nymphal stages, rises at nymphal molts, and is absent when the adult cuticle forms. This supports the bug-expression portion attributed to this source, but our copy does not compare that temporal pattern with chinmo. The cockroach finding is separately cited in the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Broad knockdown nymphs differ from normal nymphs in that their wing pads grow isometrically with the rest of the body rather than showing positive allometric growth.

    “They differ from normal nymphs in that their wing pads grow isometrically with the rest of the body rather than showing positive allometric growth [22,16,43].”

    From Regulation of metamorphosis in holometabolous insects (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results report that Broad knockdown reduces wing-pad growth while leaving leg and antenna growth unaffected. They say wing growth becomes “more isometric,” not fully isometric: the wing-pad diagonal still grows 2.0-fold, compared with 1.5-fold for the legs and antennae. The claim overstates the degree of isometry. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Karim, F. D., Guild, G. M. & Thummel, C. S. (1993) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 118, 977-988.
  2. Gilbert, L., Atkinson, B. & Tata, J. (Academic, San Diego), pp. 321-361.
  3. Zhou, X. & Riddiford, L. M. (2002) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 129, 2259-2269.
  4. Uhlirova, M., Foy, B. D., Beaty, B. J., Olson, K. E., Riddiford, L. M. & Jindra, M. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15607-15612.
  5. Evans, P. D. (Academic, London), Vol. 24, pp. 213-274.
  6. Locke, M. & Smith, D. S. (Academic, New York), pp. 369-383.
  7. Waddington, C. H. (1939) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 25, 299-307.
  8. Emery, I. F., Bedian, V. & Guild, G. M. (1994) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 120, 3275-3287.
  9. Gilbert, L. I., Tata, J. R. & Atkinson, B. G. (Academic, San Diego), pp. 3-58.
  10. Hinton, H. E. (1963) Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. London 38, 77-85.
  11. Erezyilmaz, D. (2004) Ph.D. thesis (University of Washington, Seattle), p. 94.
  12. Zhou, B. (2000) Ph.D. thesis (Univ. of Washington, Seattle).
  13. Ahmad, K. F., Engel, C. K. & Prive, G. G. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12123-12128.
  14. Zollman, S., Godt, D., Prive, G. G., Couderc, J.-L. & Laski, F. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10717-10721.
  15. Hughes, C. A. & Kaufman, T. C. (2000) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 127, 3683-3694.
  16. Liu, P. Z. & Kaufman, T. C. (2004) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 131, 1515-1527.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erezyilmaz, D. F., Riddiford, L. M., & Truman, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-05-02
Volume
103
Issue
18
Pages
6925-6930
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2092513725
Cited by
122
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9904959)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM060122, GM 60122)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Hemiptera Insect Studies
Keywords
Oncopeltus fasciatus, milkweed bug, hemimetabolous development, direct development, nymphal instars, juvenile hormone, precocene II, morphogenesis, pigmentation patterns, holometabolous insects, developmental gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Juvenile Hormones, Metamorphosis, Biological, Molecular Sequence Data, Morphogenesis, Nymph, Pigmentation, RNA, Transcription Factors, Wings, Animal, Insect Proteins, Heteroptera, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review