Cited by 16Schizophrenia research and treatmentMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health and Psychiatry

Poor outcome associated with symptomatic deterioration among help‐seeking individuals at risk for psychosis: a naturalistic follow‐up study

Morita, Keiko, Kobayashi, Hiroyuki, Takeshi, Kiyoaki, Tsujino, Naohisa, Nemoto, Takahiro, Mizuno, Masafumi·2014·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Aims: It remains debatable whether early intervention for psychosis is capable of meeting the needs of at‐risk subjects. The aims of this study were to describe the actual impact of interventions on subjective difficulties and to explore the factors that may be associated with a poor outcome. Methods: Participants were help‐seeking outpatients at a university hospital who met the C riteria of P rodromal S yndromes. Changes in the symptoms, subjective experience and current insight were assessed using the S cales of P rodromal S ymptoms, the S ubjective W ell‐being under N euroleptics, and the S cale to A ssess U nawareness of M ental D isorder, respectively. Global functioning, social functioning and subjective quality of life were evaluated using the G lobal A ssessment of F unctioning S cale, the S ocial F unctioning S cale, and the WHO‐Q uality of L ife 26, respectively. These measures were assessed both at baseline and after 1 year. Results: Forty‐six patients agreed to participate. Of the 27 patients who completed the reassessment at the follow‐up point, 13 patients (48%) showed little improvement in their positive/negative symptoms, subjective well‐being or awareness of their symptoms. Additionally, less severe negative symptoms, more severe general symptoms and lower subjective well‐being at baseline significantly predicted a deterioration of positive/negative symptoms after 1 year. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the current strategy for reducing psychosis risk based on positive symptoms should be reappraised.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.12032

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morita, K., Kobayashi, H., Takeshi, K., Tsujino, N., Nemoto, T., & Mizuno, M.
Affiliations
  • Toho University (JP)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-24
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
24-31
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W1483856166
Cited by
16
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
psychosis risk, early intervention in psychosis, symptom deterioration, negative symptoms, positive symptoms, subjective well-being, awareness of mental disorder, quality of life, social functioning, global functioning, predictors of poor outcome
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotherapy, Psychotic Disorders, Psychotropic Drugs, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Early Medical Intervention, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review