Cited by 6Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Do fewer males present to clinical high‐risk services for psychosis relative to first‐episode services?

Wilson, Robin P., Patel, Rashmi, Bhattacharyya, Sagnik·2017·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Aim: A decline in the rate of transition to psychosis in patients presenting with clinical high‐risk has been reported in the literature. Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain this decline. In this brief report, we aimed to explore whether the demographic group presenting to clinical high‐risk services differs from the ‘end‐point’ population who present with first‐episode psychosis (FEP), by focusing on gender. Method: Gender distribution was compared between clinical high‐risk (CHR) and FEP using data extracted from published study samples and clinical data from corresponding cohorts within the same catchment area in South London. Results: The proportion of males was significantly higher in FEP compared to CHR services in the literature describing Europe, Australia and North America and in the clinical cohort from South London. Conclusion: Males are under‐represented in existing CHR services in Europe, Australia and North America. This could reflect less willingness in males to seek help if experiencing low‐level psychological distress and may be related to the declining transition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.12311

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transitivity assumption was examined by assessing distributions of potential effect modifiers across comparisons in the network.

    “The transitivity assumption was examined by assessing the distributions of potential effect modifiers for every comparison in the network, including percentage of males 68 , age 69 , percentage exposed to antipsychotic medications at baseline 70 , type of blinding and publication year 6 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, R. P., Patel, R., & Bhattacharyya, S.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bhattacharyya, Sagnik
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-28
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
429-435
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W2285506215
Cited by
6
References
53
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council Clinical Research Training Fellowship
  • NIHR (CS-11-001)
  • UK MRC (MR/J012149/1)
  • NIHR Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London
  • Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
clinical high risk for psychosis, first-episode psychosis, gender differences, help-seeking, transition to psychosis, South London
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Europe, Female, Humans, London, Male, Mental Health Services, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review