Cited by 42Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Screening for psychosis risk among adolescents in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: a description of the first step with the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16)

Open access
de Jong, Yvonne, Mulder, Cornelis L., Boon, Albert E., Deen, Mathijs, van ’t Hof, Maarten, van der Gaag, Mark·2018·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

AIM: Although the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) is used as a screener in the early detection of psychosis risk, little is known about PQ-16 scores among adolescents referred to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. We assessed such scores in adolescents referred to these services in the Netherlands, and also their associations with age, gender, diagnosis and level of functioning. METHODS: The PQ-16 was added to regular intake procedures. RESULTS: The PQ-16 was completed by 176 adolescents (mean age 14.58 years; standard deviation = 1.50; 55.1% females), 34.7% of whom scored above the current cut-off score of ≥6 items. Positive item scores with the highest odds ratio for scoring above the cut-off were related to tasting or smelling things, seeing things and hearing thoughts out aloud. There were no age-, gender- or disorder-related differences in total scores on the PQ-16. Lower Global Assessment of Functioning scores were associated with higher total scores on the PQ-16. CONCLUSIONS: The PQ-16 is easy to implement in routine assessment and can be useful to bring up potential psychotic symptoms for further exploration in an early stage, especially in adolescents with low Global Assessment of Functioning scores. The PQ-16 total scores were not confounded by differences in age, gender or disorder. Future research should investigate the true nature of PQ-16 items and whether the item scores and cut-off scores of the PQ-16 in adolescence have any predictive value regarding the development of an ultra high-risk status, a psychotic disorder or other mental disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.12362

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At baseline, the frequency of positive screens for psychosis risk with the Prodromal Questionnaire was high, similar to the risk found with this questionnaire for adolescents referred to treatment services.

    “At baseline, the frequency of positive screens for psychosis risk with the Prodromal Questionnaire was high, similar to the risk found with this questionnaire for adolescents referred to treatment services;34”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Jong, Y., Mulder, C. L., Boon, A. E., Deen, M., van ’t Hof, M., & van der Gaag, M.
Affiliations
  • Lucertis Center for Child and Adolescence Psychiatry Rotterdam The Netherlands
  • Parnassia Groep (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • VU University and EMGO Mental Health and Care Research, Dept. of Clinical Psychology Amsterdam The Netherlands
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-09
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
669-676
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W2555690434
Cited by
42
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Parnassia Research Academy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
Prodromal Questionnaire, psychosis risk screening, adolescents, early detection of psychosis, child and adolescent mental health services, Global Assessment of Functioning, psychotic symptoms, psychiatric referral, cut-off values
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Netherlands, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Adolescent Health Services, Early Diagnosis, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review