Cited by 13Action Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Does f MRI repetition suppression reveal mirror neuron activity in the human brain? Insights from univariate and multivariate analysis

Open access
Fuelscher, Ian, Caeyenberghs, Karen, Enticott, Peter Gregory, Kirkovski, Melissa, Farquharson, Shawna, Lum, Jarrad, Hyde, Christian·2019·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Mirror neurons (MN) have been proposed as the neural substrate for a wide range of clinical, social and cognitive phenomena. Over the last decade, a commonly used tool for investigating MN activity in the human brain has been functional magnetic resonance (f MRI) repetition suppression (RS) paradigms. However, the available evidence is mixed, largely owing to inconsistent application of the methodological criteria necessary to infer MN properties. This raises concerns about the degree to which one can infer the presence (or absence) of MN activity from earlier accounts that adopted RS paradigms. We aimed to clarify this issue using a well‐validated f MRI RS paradigm and tested for mirror properties by rigorously applying the widely accepted criteria necessary to demonstrate MN activity using traditional univariate techniques and Multivariate Pattern Analysis (MVPA). While univariate whole brain analysis in healthy adults showed uni‐modal RS effects within the supplementary motor area, no evidence for cross‐modal RS effects consistent with mirror neuron activity was found. MVPA on the other hand revealed a region along the anterior intraparietal sulcus that met the criteria for MN activity. Taken together, these results clarify disparate evidence from earlier RS studies, highlighting that traditional univariate analysis of RS data may not be sensitive for detecting MN activity when rigorously applying the requisite criteria. In light of these findings, we recommend that short of increasing sample sizes substantially, future studies using RS paradigms to investigate MN s across the human brain consider the use of MVPA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ejn.14370

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fuelseher, I., Caeyenberghs, K., Enticott, P. G., Kirkovski, M., Farquharson, S., Lum, J. & Hyde, C. (2019). Does <i>f</i>MRI repetition suppression reveal mirror neuron activity in the human brain? Insights from univariate and multivariate analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 50 (5), pp.2877-2892. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14370. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/285642

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuelscher, I., Caeyenberghs, K., Enticott, P. G., Kirkovski, M., Farquharson, S., Lum, J., & Hyde, C.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Fuelscher, Ian
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-25
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
2877-2892
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2913425162
Cited by
13
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
mirror neurons, repetition suppression, multivariate pattern analysis, supplementary motor area, anterior intraparietal sulcus
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Multivariate Analysis, Young Adult, Mirror Neurons, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review