Cited by 1,386Action Observation and SynchronizationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFace Recognition and Perception

ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain

Open access
Caspers, Svenja, Zilles, Karl, Laird, Angela R., Eickhoff, Simon B.·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

Over the last decade, many neuroimaging studies have assessed the human brain networks underlying action observation and imitation using a variety of tasks and paradigms. Nevertheless, questions concerning which areas consistently contribute to these networks irrespective of the particular experimental design and how such processing may be lateralized remain unresolved. The current study aimed at identifying cortical areas consistently involved in action observation and imitation by combining activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis with probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps. Meta-analysis of 139 functional magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography experiments revealed a bilateral network for both action observation and imitation. Additional subanalyses for different effectors within each network revealed highly comparable activation patterns to the overall analyses on observation and imitation, respectively, indicating an independence of these findings from potential confounds. Conjunction analysis of action observation and imitation meta-analyses revealed a bilateral network within frontal premotor, parietal, and temporo-occipital cortex. The most consistently rostral inferior parietal area was PFt, providing evidence for a possible homology of this region to macaque area PF. The observation and imitation networks differed particularly with respect to the involvement of Broca's area: whereas both networks involved a caudo-dorsal part of BA 44, activation during observation was most consistent in a more rostro-dorsal location, i.e., dorsal BA 45, while activation during imitation was most consistent in a more ventro-caudal aspect, i.e., caudal BA 44. The present meta-analysis thus summarizes and amends previous descriptions of the human brain networks related to action observation and imitation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112

Cites

207 of 207 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The neural substrates for person and action perception span the fusiform gyrus, occipitotemporal cortex, and posterior superior temporal sulcus, as well as the mirror neuron system.

    “The neural substrates for person and action perception span the fusiform gyrus, occipitotemporal cortex, and posterior superior temporal sulcus, as well as the mirror neuron system (Kanwisher, 2010;Caspers, et al., 2010).”

    From The inhibition of automatic imitation: a meta-analysis and synthesis of fMRI studies (2018) · cites this paper as Caspers, et al., 2010

  • A recent meta-analysis of functional imaging studies found consistent responses during imitation tasks in classical MN areas, suggesting a possible functional involvement of MNs in imitation.

    “A recent meta-analysis of functional imaging studies found consistent responses during imitation tasks in classical MN areas, suggesting a possible functional involvement of MNs in imitation”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Caspers, Zilles, Laird, & Eickhoff, 2010

  • A random-effects inference was invoked, focusing on above-chance convergence across different experiments.

    “a random-effects inference was invoked, focusing on the above-chance convergence across different experiments”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caspers, S., Zilles, K., Laird, A. R., & Eickhoff, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Caspers, Svenja
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
1148-1167
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084475173
Cited by
1,386
References
207
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 52
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Human Brain Project (R01-MH074457-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
action observation, action imitation, mirror neuron system, brain networks, Broca's area, inferior parietal cortex, temporo-occipital cortex, hemispheric lateralization, activation likelihood estimation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motion Perception, Motor Activity, Neural Pathways, Probability, Likelihood Functions, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review