Cited by 41Long-Term Effects of COVID-19Infectious Encephalopathies and EncephalitisCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

COVID‐19 meningitis without pulmonary involvement with positive cerebrospinal fluid PCR

Khodamoradi, Z., Hosseini, S. A., Gholampoor Saadi, M. H., Mehrabi, Z., Sasani, M. R., Yaghoubi, S.·2020·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) typically presents with respiratory illness ranging in severity. Neurological complications of the disease remain largely unknown. Herein, we discuss the case of a woman diagnosed with COVID‐19 meningitis following two positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) RT‐PCR assays, and highlight the importance of recognizing the neurological manifestations of the disease. Case report: The patient was a 49‐year‐old woman with a history of hypertension who presented with non‐specific symptoms (fever, headache, malaise, nausea/vomiting). Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed a lack of pulmonary involvement and oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal RT‐PCR was negative for COVID‐19. A lumbar puncture was performed on the third day of admission and the CSF analysis elucidated a viral pattern, but the CSF bacterial culture and RT‐PCR assay for herpes simplex virus were both negative. Surprisingly, the CSF RT‐PCR for COVID‐19 was positive. The diagnosis of COVID‐19 meningitis was made and the patient was treated solely with Kaletra®, with a second CSF analysis confirming our unique finding 1 week later. The patient's clinical characteristics improved progressively, and she was discharged in excellent general condition after 21 days. Conclusion: In contrast to what was originally believed, the SARS‐CoV‐2 can cause meningitis in isolation, perhaps by crossing the blood‐brain barrier. Hence, it seems essential that physicians maintain a high index of suspicion for neurological involvement among COVID‐19 patients, with early CSF analysis and brain imaging sometimes being indicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ene.14536

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khodamoradi, Z., Hosseini, S. A., Gholampoor Saadi, M. H., Mehrabi, Z., Sasani, M. R., & Yaghoubi, S.
Affiliations
  • Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Shiraz Iran
Corresponding author
Yaghoubi, S.
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-08
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
2668-2669
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W3084550572
Cited by
41
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, meningitis, neurological complications, blood-brain barrier, lumbar puncture, antiretroviral therapy, viral meningitis
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Blood-Brain Barrier, Female, Humans, Meningitis, Viral, Middle Aged, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review