The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?
Open accessAbstract
The use of antibiotics in agriculture is routinely described as a major contributor to the clinical problem of resistant disease in human medicine. While a link is plausible, there are no data conclusively showing the magnitude of the threat emerging from agriculture. Here, we define the potential mechanisms by which agricultural antibiotic use could lead to human disease and use case studies to critically assess the potential risk from each. The three mechanisms considered are as follows 1: direct infection with resistant bacteria from an animal source, 2: breaches in the species barrier followed by sustained transmission in humans of resistant strains arising in livestock, and 3: transfer of resistance genes from agriculture into human pathogens. Of these, mechanism 1 is the most readily estimated, while significant is small in comparison with the overall burden of resistant disease. Several cases of mechanism 2 are known, and we discuss the likely livestock origins of resistant clones of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium, but while it is easy to show relatedness the direction of transmission is hard to assess in robust fashion. More difficult yet to study is the contribution of mechanism 3, which may be the most important of all.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens
Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M.-A., Roy, S. L., Jones, J. L., & Griffin, P. M. (2011) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1701.p11101 · Cited by 7,657
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: why are they here, and where do they come from?
Bonten, M. J., Willems, R., & Weinstein, R. A. (2001) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(01)00145-1 · Cited by 400
Spoor, L. E., McAdam, P. R., Weinert, L. A., Rambaut, A., Hasman, H., Aarestrup, F. M., Kearns, A. M., Larsen, A. R., Skov, R. L., & Fitzgerald, J. R. (2013) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00356-13 · Cited by 239
Cited by
Antimicrobial Resistance: Implications and Costs
Dadgostar, P. (2019) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s234610 · Cited by 2,024
Manyi-Loh, C., Mamphweli, S., Meyer, E., & Okoh, A. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23040795 · Cited by 1,808
Antibiotic-Induced Changes in the Intestinal Microbiota and Disease
Becattini, S., Taur, Y., & Pamer, E. G. (2016) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2016.04.003 · Cited by 901
Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: a potential threat to public health
Samreen, Ahmad, I., Malak, H. A., & Abulreesh, H. H. (2021) · Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance · doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2021.08.001 · Cited by 727
Jajere, S. M. (2019) · Veterinary World · doi:10.14202/vetworld.2019.504-521 · Cited by 621
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, Q., Wang, W., Regev‐Yochay, G., Lipsitch, M., & Hanage, W. P.
- Venue
- Evolutionary Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 240-247
- ISSN
- 1752-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2132993428
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.