The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LESS IS MORE: SELECTIVE ADVANTAGES CAN EXPLAIN THE PREVALENT LOSS OF BIOSYNTHETIC GENES IN BACTERIA: ADAPTIVE LOSS OF BIOSYNTHETIC GENES IN BACTERIA
Abstract
Bacteria that have adapted to nutrient-rich, stable environments are typically characterized by reduced genomes. The loss of biosynthetic genes frequently renders these lineages auxotroph, hinging their survival on an environmental uptake of certain metabolites. The evolutionary forces that drive this genome degradation, however, remain elusive. Our analysis of 949 metabolic networks revealed auxotrophies are likely highly prevalent in both symbiotic and free-living bacteria. To unravel whether selective advantages can account for the rampant loss of anabolic genes, we systematically determined the fitness consequences that result from deleting conditionally essential biosynthetic genes from the genomes of Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baylyi in the presence of the focal nutrient. Pairwise competition experiments with each of 20 mutants auxotrophic for different amino acids, vitamins, and nucleobases against the prototrophic wild type unveiled a pronounced, concentration-dependent growth advantage of around 13% for virtually all mutants tested. Individually deleting different genes from the same biosynthesis pathway entailed gene-specific fitness consequences and loss of the same biosynthetic genes from the genomes of E. coli and A. baylyi differentially affected the fitness of the resulting auxotrophic mutants. Taken together, our findings suggest adaptive benefits could drive the loss of conditionally essential biosynthetic genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Construction of Escherichia coli K‐12 in‐frame, single‐gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection
Baba, T., Ara, T., Hasegawa, M., Takai, Y., Okumura, Y., Baba, M., Datsenko, K. A., Tomita, M., Wanner, B. L., & Mori, H. (2006) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100050 · Cited by 7,858
Interdependence of Cell Growth and Gene Expression: Origins and Consequences
Scott, M., Gunderson, C. W., Mateescu, E. M., Zhang, Z., & Hwa, T. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192588 · Cited by 1,470
Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein
Dekel, E., & Alon, U. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03842 · Cited by 766
Bacterial Adaptation through Loss of Function
Hottes, A. K., Freddolino, L., Khare, A., Donnell, Z. N., Liu, J. C., & Tavazoie, S. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003617 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter interface
Kleber, M., Bourg, I. C., Coward, E. K., Hansel, C. M., Myneni, S. C. B., & Nunan, N. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y · Cited by 1,254
Metabolic cross-feeding via intercellular nanotubes among bacteria
Pande, S., Shitut, S., Freund, L., Westermann, M., Bertels, F., Colesie, C., Bischofs, I. B., & Kost, C. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7238 · Cited by 273
Self-citationBlack Queen evolution: the role of leakiness in structuring microbial communities
Morris, J. J. (2015) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2015.05.004 · Cited by 207
Origins of multicellular evolvability in snowflake yeast
Ratcliff, W. C., Fankhauser, J. D., Rogers, D. W., Greig, D., & Travisano, M. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7102 · Cited by 203
Proteome reallocation in Escherichia coli with increasing specific growth rate
Peebo, K., Valgepea, K., Maser, A., Nahku, R., Adamberg, K., & Vilu, R. (2015) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c4mb00721b · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- D'Souza, G., Waschina, S., Pande, S., Bohl, K., Kaleta, C., & Kost, C.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-07-09
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2559-2570
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1579467601
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LESS IS MORE: SELECTIVE ADVANTAGES CAN EXPLAIN THE PREVALENT LOSS OF BIOSYNTHETIC GENES IN BACTERIA: ADAPTIVE LOSS OF BIOSYNTHETIC GENES IN BACTERIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/evo.12468
- The paper
- D'Souza, G., Waschina, S., Pande, S., Bohl, K., Kaleta, C., & Kost, C. (2014). LESS IS MORE: SELECTIVE ADVANTAGES CAN EXPLAIN THE PREVALENT LOSS OF BIOSYNTHETIC GENES IN BACTERIA: ADAPTIVE LOSS OF BIOSYNTHETIC GENES IN BACTERIA. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12468
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.