Cited by 61melanin and skin pigmentationSkin Protection and AgingMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

Pigment‐independent cAMP‐mediated epidermal thickening protects against cutaneous UV injury by keratinocyte proliferation

Open access
Scott, Timothy L., Christian, Perry A., Kesler, Melissa V., Donohue, Kevin M., Shelton, Brent, Wakamatsu, Kazumasa, Ito, Shosuke, D'Orazio, John·2012·Experimental Dermatology

Abstract

The epidermis increases pigmentation and epidermal thickness in response to ultraviolet exposure to protect against UV‐associated carcinogenesis; however, the contribution of epidermal thickness has been debated. In a humanized skin mouse model that maintains interfollicular epidermal melanocytes, we found that forskolin, a small molecule that directly activates adenylyl cyclase and promotes cAMP generation, up‐regulated epidermal eumelanin accumulation in fair‐skinned melanocortin‐1‐receptor (M c1r)‐defective animals. Forskolin‐induced pigmentation was associated with a reproducible expansion of epidermal thickness irrespective of melanization or the presence of epidermal melanocytes. Rather, forskolin‐enhanced epidermal thickening was mediated through increased keratinocyte proliferation, indirectly through secreted factor(s) from cutaneous fibroblasts. We identified keratinocyte growth factor (K gf) as a forskolin‐induced fibroblast‐derived cytokine that promoted keratinocyte proliferation, as forskolin induced K gf expression both in the skin and in primary fibroblasts. Lastly, we found that even in the absence of pigmentation, forskolin‐induced epidermal thickening significantly diminished the amount of UV‐A and UV‐B that passed through whole skin and reduced the amount of UV‐B‐associated epidermal sunburn cells. These findings suggest the possibility of pharmacologic‐induced epidermal thickening as a novel UV‐protective therapeutic intervention, particularly for individuals with defects in pigmentation and adaptive melanization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/exd.12012

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of UVR on epidermal thickness described in the literature is inconsistent.

    “The effect of UVR on epidermal thickness described in the literature is inconsistent (Coelho et al, 2009;Felton et al, 2020;Scott et al, 2012).”

    From Effect of Repeated Low-Dose UVR Exposure on Skin Inflammation Threshold, Skin Biomarkers, and Vitamin D in Healthy Adults (2025) · cites this paper as Scott et al, 2012

    The Discussion says most reports describe UV-induced epidermal thickening and that the role of melanocytes in that thickening has been unclear. It does not say that studies report inconsistent effects of UVR on epidermal thickness. I searched for conflicting or variable effects of UV exposure on thickness in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scott, T. L., Christian, P. A., Kesler, M. V., Donohue, K. M., Shelton, B., Wakamatsu, K., Ito, S., & D'Orazio, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Fujita Health University (JP)
Corresponding author
D'Orazio, John
Venue
Experimental Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-21
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
771-777
ISSN
  • 0906-6705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0625
OpenAlex
W2142827380
Cited by
61
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer (R01 CA131075-02)
  • Wendy Will Case Cancer Research Fund
  • Markey Cancer Foundation
  • Children's Miracle Network
  • Jennifer and David Dickens Melanoma Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
epidermal thickening, cAMP signaling, forskolin, adenylate cyclase, keratinocyte proliferation, keratinocyte growth factor, UV protection, ultraviolet radiation, MC1R, eumelanin, sunburn cells
MeSH terms
Cyclic AMP, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Epidermis, Colforsin, Humans, Melanocytes, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Pigments, Biological, Skin, Skin Pigmentation, Ultraviolet Rays, Keratinocytes, Apoptosis, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Keratin-14

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review