The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skin lesion segmentation and classification: A unified framework of deep neural network features fusion and selection
Abstract
Automated skin lesion diagnosis from dermoscopic images is a difficult process due to several notable problems such as artefacts (hairs), irregularity, lesion shape, and irrelevant features extraction. These problems make the segmentation and classification process difficult. In this research, we proposed an optimized colour feature (OCF) of lesion segmentation and deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)‐based skin lesion classification. A hybrid technique is proposed to remove the artefacts and improve the lesion contrast. Then, colour segmentation technique is presented known as OCFs. The OCF approach is further improved by an existing saliency approach, which is fused by a novel pixel‐based method. A DCNN‐9 model is implemented to extract deep features and fused with OCFs by a novel parallel fusion approach. After this, a normal distribution‐based high‐ranking feature selection technique is utilized to select the most robust features for classification. The suggested method is evaluated on ISBI series (2016, 2017, and 2018) datasets. The experiments are performed in two steps and achieved average segmentation accuracy of more than 90% on selected datasets. Moreover, the achieve classification accuracy of 92.1%, 96.5%, and 85.1%, respectively, on all three datasets shows that the presented method has remarkable performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence Estimate of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (Keratinocyte Carcinomas) in the US Population, 2012
Rogers, H. W., Weinstock, M. A., Feldman, S. R., & Coldiron, B. M. (2015) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1187 · Cited by 1,815
Automatic skin lesion segmentation using deep fully convolutional networks with jaccard distance.
Yuan, Y., Chao, M., & Lo, Y.-C. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2695227 · Cited by 687
Big data analysis for brain tumor detection: Deep convolutional neural networks
Amin, J., Sharif, M., Yasmin, M., & Fernandes, S. L. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.04.065 · Cited by 327
Self-citation
Cited by
Jabeen, K., Khan, M. A., Alhaisoni, M., Tariq, U., Zhang, Y.-D., Hamza, A., Mickus, A., & Damaševičius, R. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22030807 · Cited by 314
Self-citationSaba, T. (2020) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.033 · Cited by 284
Self-citationNaeem, A., Farooq, M. S., Khelifi, A., & Abid, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3001507 · Cited by 189
An effective skin cancer classification mechanism via medical vision transformer
Aladhadh, S., Alsanea, M., Aloraini, M., Khan, T., Habib, S., & Islam, M. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22114008 · Cited by 113
Review on enhancing clinical decision support system using machine learning
Masood, A., Naseem, U., Rashid, J., Kim, J., & Razzak, I. (2024) · CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology · doi:10.1049/cit2.12286 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, M. A., Sharif, M. I., Raza, M., Anjum, A., Saba, T., & Shad, S. A.
- Venue
- Expert Systems
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-18
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0266-4720 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0394
- OpenAlex
- W2995166707
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skin lesion segmentation and classification: A unified framework of deep neural network features fusion and selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/exsy.12497
- The paper
- Khan, M. A., Sharif, M. I., Raza, M., Anjum, A., Saba, T., & Shad, S. A. (2022). Skin lesion segmentation and classification: A unified framework of deep neural network features fusion and selection. Expert Systems. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.