Cited by 57Marriage and Sexual RelationshipsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Extramarital Sex and Marital Dissolution: Does Identity of the Extramarital Partner Matter?

Labrecque, Lindsay T., Whisman, Mark A.·2020·Family Process

Abstract

Panel data from married adults (N = 1,853) in the General Social Survey, a probability sample of the adult household population of the United States, were used to evaluate (a) the longitudinal association between extramarital sex and marital dissolution 2 years later, (b) whether probability of marital dissolution differed as a function of the type of relationship people reported having with their extramarital sex partner, and (c) the degree to which these associations were incremental to participants’ level of marital satisfaction at baseline. Compared to people who reported not engaging in extramarital sex, those who reported engaging in extramarital sex at baseline were significantly more likely to be separated or divorced 2 years later. Furthermore, the association between having extramarital sex with a close personal friend and marital dissolution was particularly strong. These associations remained statistically significant after adjusting for marital satisfaction. Results suggest that the identity of the extramarital sex partner and the type of relationship a person has with him or her has important implications for probability of marital dissolution above and beyond the contribution of marital satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/famp.12472

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women tended to judge behaviors as being unfaithful slightly more strictly than men.

    “However, women tended to judge behaviors as being unfaithful slightly more strictly than men, which is in line with other research in the existing literature [17].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Men appear to hold more permissive attitudes towards extramarital sex than women do.

    “research has shown that men appear to hold more permissive attitudes towards extramarital sex than women do [17].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Women tend to judge more behaviors as unfaithful than men.

    “Men and women react to emotional and sexual infidelity differently, as research suggests that women tend to judge more behaviors as unfaithful, while men hold more permissive attitudes towards extramarital sex [17].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Men hold more permissive attitudes towards extramarital sex than women.

    “Men and women react to emotional and sexual infidelity differently, as research suggests that women tend to judge more behaviors as unfaithful, while men hold more permissive attitudes towards extramarital sex [17].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Men and women react to emotional and sexual infidelity differently.

    “Men and women react to emotional and sexual infidelity differently, as research suggests that women tend to judge more behaviors as unfaithful, while men hold more permissive attitudes towards extramarital sex [17].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Labrecque, L. T., & Whisman, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
  • Labrecque, Lindsay T.
  • Whisman, Mark A.
Venue
Family Process
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-09
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
1308-1318
ISSN
  • 0014-7370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-5300
OpenAlex
W2957323259
Cited by
57
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Process (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
adultery, divorce, marital separation, friendship, marital satisfaction, marital stability, infidelity
MeSH terms
Adult, Divorce, Extramarital Relations, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Sampling Studies, Sexual Partners, Social Identification, United States, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review