“He Could Scare Me Without Laying a Hand on Me”: Mothers’ Experiences of Nonviolent Coercive Control During Marriage and After Separation
Abstract
Studies demonstrate the negative effects of violent coercive control but few examine coercive control without violence. This study describes the characteristics of nonviolent coercive control among 8 divorcing mothers and compares them with 47 mothers who experienced violent coercive control or no violence/no control. Mothers with nonviolent coercive control reported more coping strategies, risk, harassment, and perceived threat than mothers with no violence/no control; similar levels of fear and control during marriage as mothers with violent coercive control; and more postseparation fear than both groups. Findings highlight the need to include nonviolent coercive control in screening methods and research measures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coercive control likely has more severe mental health implications than situational psychological IPV or physical IPV not embedded in coercive control.
“Importantly, coercive control is both highly prevalent, occurring in up to 58% of IPV relationships, and a particularly insidious form of IPV that likely has more severe mental health implications than situational psychological IPV, or even physical IPV that is not embedded in the context of coercive control (Crossman et al., 2016; Kennedy et al., 2018; Stark, 2007).”
From The Trauma and Mental Health Impacts of Coercive Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Crossman et al., 2016
Coercive control is highly prevalent, occurring in up to 58% of IPV relationships.
“Importantly, coercive control is both highly prevalent, occurring in up to 58% of IPV relationships, and a particularly insidious form of IPV that likely has more severe mental health implications than situational psychological IPV, or even physical IPV that is not embedded in the context of coercive control (Crossman et al., 2016; Kennedy et al., 2018; Stark, 2007).”
From The Trauma and Mental Health Impacts of Coercive Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Crossman et al., 2016
In Crossman et al.'s qualitative study, the majority of the eight separated women experienced coercive control tactics that included personal threats during child visitation, often the only contact between the ex-partners.
“Similarly, Crossman et al. (2016) reported that the majority of the eight separated women in their qualitative study experienced coercive control tactics that included personal threats during child visitation, often the only contact between the ex-partners.”
From “He Tells People That I Am Going to Kill My Children”: Post-Separation Coercive Control in Men Who Perpetrate IPV (2024) · cites this paper as Crossman et al., 2016
Although abuse with respect to custody issues after separation from an abusive partner has been widely studied, relatively little research has examined post-separation abuse beyond child custody, and these have mostly consisted of qualitative studies with relatively small sample sizes.
“In summary, although abuse with respect to custody issues after separation from an abusive partner has been widely studied, relatively little research has examined post-separation abuse beyond child custody, and these have mostly consisted of qualitative studies with relatively small sample sizes (i.e. Crossman et al., 2016; Krigel & Benjamin, 2021; Miller & Smolter, 2011; Rivera et al., 2018; Toe”
From “He Tells People That I Am Going to Kill My Children”: Post-Separation Coercive Control in Men Who Perpetrate IPV (2024) · cites this paper as Crossman et al., 2016
The coercive control tactics used against women by their ex-partners in both the quantitative and qualitative analyses in the current study are consistent with the previously published, largely qualitative research on this topic.
“The coercive control tactics used against women by their ex-partners in both the quantitative and qualitative analyses in the current study are consistent with the previously published, largely qualitative research on this topic (Broughton & Ford-Gilboe, 2017; Crossman et al., 2016; Douglas, 2018; Hardesty & Ganong, 2006; Hayes, 2012; Krigel & Benjamin, 2021; Sharp-Jeffs et al., 2018; Toews & Berm”
From “He Tells People That I Am Going to Kill My Children”: Post-Separation Coercive Control in Men Who Perpetrate IPV (2024) · cites this paper as Crossman et al., 2016
Intimidation manifests as psychological abuse and includes tactics such as damaging property, gaslighting and non-verbal threats such as hostile gun displays.
“Intimidation manifests as psychological abuse and includes tactics such as damaging property, gaslighting and non-verbal threats such as hostile gun displays (Brownridge, 2006; Brownridge et al., 2008; Crossman et al., 2016; Hardesty & Ganong, 2006; Miller & Smolter, 2011; Stark & Hester, 2019).”
From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Crossman et al., 2016
The study of IPV has faced persistent definitional and measurement dilemmas.
“The study of IPV has faced persistent definitional and measurement dilemmas (Crossman et al., 2016), and no measurement tool exists that measures the complexity of long-term, ongoing abuse experiences following separation from an abusive partner and co-parent (Cleak et al., 2018).”
From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Crossman et al., 2016
Controlling and threatening, but non-physically violent, behaviours have rarely been viewed as violence by policymakers, law enforcement, and the legal system.
“Controlling and threatening, but non-physically violent, behaviours have rarely been viewed as violence by policymakers, law enforcement and the legal system (Crossman et al., 2016; Stark & Hester, 2019).”
From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Crossman et al., 2016
Cites
Risk Factors for Femicide in Abusive Relationships: Results From a Multisite Case Control Study
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., Gary, F., Glass, N., McFarlane, J., Sachs, C., et al. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.7.1089 · Cited by 1,550 · see citing works
Coercive Control: The Entrapment Of Women In Personal Life
Stark, E. (2007) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195154276.001.0001 · Cited by 1,502 · see citing works
Education Groups for Men Who Batter
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993) · doi:10.1891/9780826179913 · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Physical aggression in early marriage: Prerelationship and relationship effects.
O'Leary, K. D., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1994) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.62.3.594 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
The Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index: Development and Application
Goodman, L., Dutton, M. A., Weinfurt, K., & Cook, S. (2003) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801202239004 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Wuest, J., Ford-Gilboe, M., Merritt-Gray, M., & Berman, H. (2003) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732303013005002 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Bell, M. E., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9096-9 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Ford-Gilboe, M., Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305274590 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Gender Inequality and Patterns of Abuse Post Leaving
Davies, L., Ford-Gilboe, M., & Hammerton, J. (2009) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-008-9204-5 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Haselschwerdt, M. L., Hardesty, J. L., & Hans, J. D. (2011) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260510370599 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coercive Control: Update and Review
Stark, E., & Hester, M. (2019) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801218816191 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Katz, E., Nikupeteri, A., & Laitinen, M. (2020) · Child Abuse Review · doi:10.1002/car.2611 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Understanding romance fraud: insights from domestic violence research
Cross, C., Dragiewicz, M., & Richards, K. (2018) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azy005 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis
Spearman, K. J., Hardesty, J. L., & Campbell, J. (2023) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.15310 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“Controlling and threatening, but non-physically violent, behaviours have rarely been viewed as violence by policymakers, law enforcement and the legal system (Crossman et al., 2016; Stark & Hester, 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Trauma and Mental Health Impacts of Coercive Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lohmann, S., Cowlishaw, S., Ney, L., O’Donnell, M., & Felmingham, K. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380231162972 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“…to 58% of IPV relationships, and a particularly insidious form of IPV that likely has more severe mental health implications than situational psychological IPV, or even physical IPV that is not embedded in the context of coercive control (Crossman et al., 2016; Kennedy et al., 2018; Stark, 2007).”
BackgroundNo way to turn: Traps encountered by many battered women with negative child custody experiences
Saunders, D. G., & Oglesby, K. H. (2016) · Journal of Child Custody · doi:10.1080/15379418.2016.1213114 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Lux, G., & Gill, S. (2021) · Family Court Review · doi:10.1111/fcre.12540 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Tutty, L. M., Lorraine Radtke, H., & Nixon, K. L. (2024) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778012231166408 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“…been noted in previous research, they have tended not to be the primary focus of the discussion, exceptions being Broughton and Ford-Gilboe (2017), Crossman et al. (2016), Douglas (2018), Hardesty and Ganong (2006), Hayes (2012), Krigel and Benjamin (2021), Sharp-Jeffs et al. (2018), Toews and…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKassing, K., & Collins, A. (2026) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605251320998 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ellis, D., Lewis, T., & Nepon, T. (2021) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801220921939 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A survey of mothers' experiences of shared parenting and domestic violence
Archer‐Kuhn, B., Saini, M., Hughes, J., Tam, D., & Trudgill, D. I. N. (2023) · Family Court Review · doi:10.1111/fcre.12715 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Crossman, K. A., Hardesty, J. L., & Raffaelli, M.
- Affiliations
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crossman, Kimberly A.
- Venue
- Violence Against Women
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-09-23
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 454-473
- ISSN
- 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8448
- OpenAlex
- W2263598162
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- divorce, mothers, coping strategies, threat perception, harassment, screening measures
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Coercion, Divorce, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Marriage, Risk Factors, Spouse Abuse, Spouses, Battered Women, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review