The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Honey bee neurogenomic responses to affiliative and agonistic social interactions
Abstract
Social interactions can be divided into two categories, affiliative and agonistic. How neurogenomic responses reflect these opposing valences is a central question in the biological embedding of experience. To address this question, we exposed honey bees to a queen larva, which evokes nursing, an affiliative alloparenting interaction, and measured the transcriptomic response of the mushroom body brain region at different times after exposure. Hundreds of genes were differentially expressed at distinct time points, revealing a dynamic temporal patterning of the response. Comparing these results to our previously published research on agonistic aggressive interactions, we found both shared and unique transcriptomic responses to each interaction. The commonly responding gene set was enriched for nuclear receptor signaling, the set specific to nursing was enriched for olfaction and neuron differentiation, and the set enriched for aggression was enriched for cytoskeleton, metabolism, and chromosome organization. Whole brain histone profiling after the affiliative interaction revealed few changes in chromatin accessibility, suggesting that the transcriptomic changes derive from already accessible areas of the genome. Although only one stimulus of each type was studied, we suggest that elements of the observed transcriptomic responses reflect molecular encoding of stimulus valence, thus priming individuals for future encounters. This hypothesis is supported by behavioral analyses showing that bees responding to either the affiliative or agonistic stimulus exhibited a higher probability of repeating the same behavior but a lower probability of performing the opposite behavior. These findings add to our understanding of the biological embedding at the molecular level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For species with an extensive repertoire of social behavior, experience and exposure to specific social stimuli can be recorded quantitatively as changes in the gene expression profile (98), much like an odometer records distance.”
From Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain (2020) · cites this paper as [98]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364
Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · Cited by 35,890
A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
Storey, J. D. (2002) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00346 · Cited by 5,603
Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state
Creyghton, M. P., Cheng, A. W., Welstead, G. G., Kooistra, T., Carey, B. W., Steine, E. J., Hanna, J., Lodato, M. A., Frampton, G. M., Sharp, P. A., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1016071107 · Cited by 4,302
A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans
Rada-Iglesias, A., Bajpai, R., Swigut, T., Brugmann, S. A., Flynn, R. A., & Wysocka, J. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09692 · Cited by 2,233
Mushroom body memoir: from maps to models
Heisenberg, M. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1074 · Cited by 1,286
Regulation of Division of Labor in Insect Societies
Robinson, G. E. (1992) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003225 · Cited by 1,106
Self-citationPattern and time course of immediate early gene expression in rat brain following acute stress
Cullinan, W. E., Herman, J. P., Battaglia, D. F., Akil, H., & Watson, S. J. (1995) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(94)00355-9 · Cited by 1,056
Neural mechanisms of aggression
Nelson, R. J., & Trainor, B. C. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2174 · Cited by 1,019
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Lorenz K, 1966, On Aggression
- 10.1007/s001140050110 · DOI
Cited by
Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain
Sinha, S., Jones, B. M., Traniello, I. M., Bukhari, S. A., Halfon, M. S., Hofmann, H. A., Huang, S., Katz, P. S., Keagy, J., Lynch, V. J., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921625117 · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shpigler, H. Y., Saul, M. C., Murdoch, E. E., Corona, F., Cash‐Ahmed, A. C., Seward, C. H., Chandrasekaran, S., Stubbs, L. J., & Robinson, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign (UIUC) Urbana Illinois
- Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Michigan Michigan
- Venue
- Genes, Brain and Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1601-1848
- 1601-183X
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 67
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Simons Foundation (SFLife 291812)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.