Cited by 262Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Do grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon?

Smith, Pete·2014·Global Change Biology

Abstract

It is increasingly commonly suggested that grasslands are a perpetual sink for carbon, and that just maintaining grasslands will yield a net carbon sink. I examine the evidence for this from repeated soil surveys, long term grassland experiments and simple mass balance calculations. I conclude that it is untenable that grasslands act as a perpetual carbon sink, and the most likely explanation for observed grassland carbon sinks over short periods is legacy effects of land use and land management prior to the beginning of flux measurement periods. Simply having grassland does not result is a carbon sink, but judicious management or previously poorly managed grasslands can increase the sink capacity. Given that grasslands are a large store of carbon, and that it is easier and faster for soils to lose carbon that it is for them to gain carbon, it is an important management target to maintain these stocks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.12561

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in SOC are greater at the beginning of crop establishment and then decline until they reach a steady state.

    “This supports the view that changes in SOC are greater at the beginning of the crop establishment and then decline until they reach a steady state (Smith, 2014).”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Smith, 2014

  • The observed SOC accumulation pattern is consistent with acknowledged patterns of SOC accumulation and is also observed in agroforestry systems.

    “This observed SOC gain has a subsequent levelling off of SOC accumulation rate and a decline when it stabilizes and reaches a steady state (Figure 1c), which is consistent with the acknowledged patterns of SOC accumulation (Smith, 2014), and also observed in agroforestry systems (Feliciano, Ledo, Hillier, & Nayak, 2018).”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Smith, 2014

  • Carbon sinks or sources in grasslands depend heavily on previous land use, climate, and/or time since conversion.

    “Others have argued that carbon sinks or sources in grasslands depend heavily on the previous land use, climate, and/or time since conversion (38).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

  • Without further disturbance, soils can become stable stores of carbon even if sequestration has stopped.

    “Without further disturbance, soils can become stable stores of C even if sequestration has stopped15.”
  • In most cases, soils find the new equilibrium within 100 years and do not sequester C anymore unless changing the land use.

    “In most cases, the soils find the new equilibrium within 100 years and do not sequester C anymore unless changing the land use15,31”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, P.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Pete
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-08
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
2708-2711
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W1968435195
Cited by
262
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 14
FWCI
24.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Scottish Government (CLC/858/11)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
grassland, soil carbon, carbon sink, carbon sequestration, legacy effects, land use history, grassland management, soil carbon stocks, mass balance, long-term grassland experiment
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Models, Biological, Soil, Carbon Sequestration, Grassland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review