Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pyrogenic organic matter production from wildfires: a missing sink in the global carbon cycle

Open access
Santín, Cristina, Doerr, Stefan H., Preston, Caroline M., González‐Rodríguez, Gil·2015·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Wildfires release substantial quantities of carbon (C) into the atmosphere but they also convert part of the burnt biomass into pyrogenic organic matter (Py OM). This is richer in C and, overall, more resistant to environmental degradation than the original biomass, and, therefore, Py OM production is an efficient mechanism for C sequestration. The magnitude of this C sink, however, remains poorly quantified, and current production estimates, which suggest that ~1‐5% of the C affected by fire is converted to Py OM, are based on incomplete inventories. Here, we quantify, for the first time, the complete range of Py OM components found in‐situ immediately after a typical boreal forest fire. We utilized an experimental high‐intensity crown fire in a jack pine forest (Pinus banksiana) and carried out a detailed pre‐ and postfire inventory and quantification of all fuel components, and the Py OM (i.e., all visually charred, blackened materials) produced in each of them. Our results show that, overall, 27.6% of the C affected by fire was retained in Py OM (4.8 ± 0.8 t C ha−1), rather than emitted to the atmosphere (12.6 ± 4.5 t C ha−1). The conversion rates varied substantially between fuel components. For down wood and bark, over half of the C affected was converted to Py OM, whereas for forest floor it was only one quarter, and less than a tenth for needles. If the overall conversion rate found here were applicable to boreal wildfire in general, it would translate into a Py OM production of ~100 Tg C yr−1 by wildfire in the global boreal regions, more than five times the amount estimated previously. Our findings suggest that Py OM production from boreal wildfires, and potentially also from other fire‐prone ecosystems, may have been underestimated and that its quantitative importance as a C sink warrants its inclusion in the global C budget estimates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.12800

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Santín, C., Doerr, S. H., Preston, C. M., & González‐Rodríguez, G.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-08
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
1621-1633
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2107397524
Cited by
301
References
70
FWCI
16.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pyrogenic organic matter production from wildfires: a missing sink in the global carbon cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.12800
The paper
Santín, C., Doerr, S. H., Preston, C. M., & González‐Rodríguez, G. (2015). Pyrogenic organic matter production from wildfires: a missing sink in the global carbon cycle. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12800

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.