The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards protecting the Great Barrier Reef from land‐based pollution
Open accessAbstract
The Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is an iconic coral reef system extending over 2000 km along the north‐east coast of Australia. Global recognition of its Outstanding Universal Value resulted in the listing of the 348 000 km 2 GBR World Heritage Area (WHA) by UNESCO in 1981. Despite various levels of national and international protection, the condition of GBR ecosystems has deteriorated over the past decades, with land‐based pollution from the adjacent catchments being a major and ongoing cause for this decline. To reduce land‐based pollution, the Australian and Queensland Governments have implemented a range of policy initiatives since 2003. Here, we evaluate the effectiveness of existing initiatives to reduce discharge of land‐based pollutants into the waters of the GBR. We conclude that recent efforts in the GBR catchments to reduce land‐based pollution are unlikely to be sufficient to protect the GBR ecosystems from declining water quality within the aspired time frames. To support management decisions for desired ecological outcomes for the GBR WHA, we identify potential improvements to current policies and incentives, as well as potential changes to current agricultural land use, based on overseas experiences and Australia's unique potential. The experience in the GBR may provide useful guidance for the management of other marine ecosystems, as reducing land‐based pollution by better managing agricultural sources is a challenge for coastal communities around the world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen
Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Smith, V. H. (1998) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:nposww]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,099
The Evolution and Future of Earth’s Nitrogen Cycle
Canfield, D. E., Glazer, A. N., & Falkowski, P. G. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1186120 · Cited by 2,697
Kroon, F. J., Kuhnert, P. M., Henderson, B. L., Wilkinson, S. N., Kinsey-Henderson, A., Abbott, B., Brodie, J. E., & Turner, R. D. R. (2012) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.10.018 · Cited by 391
Self-citationChallenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystems
Boesch, D. F. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02804914 · Cited by 381
What determines soil organic carbon stocks in the grazing lands of north-eastern Australia?
Allen, D. E., Pringle, M. J., Bray, S., Hall, T. J., O’Reagain, P. O., Phelps, D., Cobon, D. H., Bloesch, P. M., & Dalal, R. C. (2013) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr13041 · Cited by 85
Cited by
The Baltic Sea as a time machine for the future coastal ocean
Reusch, T. B. H., Dierking, J., Andersson, H. C., Bonsdorff, E., Carstensen, J., Casini, M., Czajkowski, M., Hasler, B., Hinsby, K., Hyytiäinen, K., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar8195 · Cited by 566
Zhao, H., Yuan, M., Strokal, M., Wu, H. C., Liu, X., Murk, A., Kroeze, C., & Osinga, R. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145017 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Kroon, F. J., Thorburn, P., Schaffelke, B., & Whitten, S.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-04-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1985-2002
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2291818356
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 49.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards protecting the Great Barrier Reef from land‐based pollution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.13262
- The paper
- Kroon, F. J., Thorburn, P., Schaffelke, B., & Whitten, S. (2016). Towards protecting the Great Barrier Reef from land‐based pollution. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13262
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.