Cited by 216Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesForest ecology and management

A catastrophic tropical drought kills hydraulically vulnerable tree species

Open access
Powers, Jennifer S., Vargas G., German, Brodribb, Timothy J., Schwartz, Naomi B., Pérez‐Aviles, Daniel, Smith‐Martin, Chris M., Becknell, Justin M., Aureli, Filippo +12 more·2020·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Drought‐related tree mortality is now a widespread phenomenon predicted to increase in magnitude with climate change. However, the patterns of which species and trees are most vulnerable to drought, and the underlying mechanisms have remained elusive, in part due to the lack of relevant data and difficulty of predicting the location of catastrophic drought years in advance. We used long‐term demographic records and extensive databases of functional traits and distribution patterns to understand the responses of 20–53 species to an extreme drought in a seasonally dry tropical forest in Costa Rica, which occurred during the 2015 El Niño Southern Oscillation event. Overall, species‐specific mortality rates during the drought ranged from 0% to 34%, and varied little as a function of tree size. By contrast, hydraulic safety margins correlated well with probability of mortality among species, while morphological or leaf economics spectrum traits did not. This firmly suggests hydraulic traits as targets for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.15037

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational studies suggest that local temperature and precipitation thresholds for dieback vary substantially depending on ecological and species-specific factors.

    “Moreover, observational studies suggest that local temperature and precipitation thresholds for dieback vary substantially depending on ecological and species-specific factors 56,57 .”

    From Amazon dieback beyond the 21st century under high-emission scenarios by Earth System models (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that mortality during the 2015 drought varied greatly among species, and a further results passage links mortality to hydraulic traits and rainfall seasonality. The paper does not establish varying local temperature or precipitation thresholds for dieback; its thresholds concern plant hydraulic function, not climate conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Aleixo, I., Norris, D., Hemerik, L., Barbosa, A., Prata, E., Costa, F., & Poorter, L. (2019). Amazonian rainforest tree mortality driven by climate and functional traits. Nature Climate Change, 9(5), 384-388. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0458-0 · DOI
  2. Allen, K., Dupuy, J. M., Gei, M. G., Hulshof, C. M., Medvigy, D., Pizano, C., . . . Powers, J. S. (2017). Will seasonally dry tropical forests be sensitive or resistant to future changes in rainfall regimes? Environmental Research Letters, 12, 023001. doi:doi.org/10.1088/1748- 9326/aa5968 · DOI
  3. Anderegg, L. D. L., L. T. Berner, G. Badgley, M. L. Sethi, B. E. Law, and J. HilleRisLambers. 2018. Within-species patterns challenge our understanding of the leaf economics spectrum. Ecology Letters, 21, 734-744
  4. Anderegg, W. R. L., Kane, J. M., & Anderegg, L. D. L. (2012). Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress. Nature Climate Change, 3, 30. doi:10.1038/nclimate1635 · DOI
  5. Anderegg, W. R. L., Klein, T., Bartlett, M., Sack, L., Pellegrini, A. F. A., Choat, B., & Jansen, S. (2016). Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought- induced tree mortality across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(18), 5024-5029. doi:10.1073/pnas.1525678113 Accepted Article Barros, F. d. V., Bittencourt, P. R. L., Brum, M., Restrepo-Coupe, N., Pereira, L., Teodoro, G. S., . . . Oliveira, R. S. (2019). Hydraulic traits explain differential responses of Amazonian forests to the 2015 El Niño-induced drought. New Phytologist, 223(3), 1253-1266. doi:10.1111/nph.15909 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L. 2012. The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: A global meta-analysis. Ecology Letters, 15, 393- 405
  7. Becknell, J. M., & Powers, J. S. (2014). Stand age and soils as drivers of plant functional traits and aboveground biomass in secondary tropical dry forest. Can. J. Forest Research, 44, 603-614. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0331 · DOI
  8. Bennett, A. C., McDowell, N. G., Allen, C. D., & Anderson-Teixeira, K. J. (2015). Larger trees suffer most during drought in forests worldwide. Nature Plants, 1(10). doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.139 · DOI
  9. Brando, P. M., J. K. Balch, D. C. Nepstad, D. C. Morton, F. E. Putz, M. T. Coe, D. Silverio, M. N. Macedo, E. A. Davidson, C. C. Nobrega, A. Alencar, and B. S. Soares. 2014. Abrupt increases in Amazonian tree mortality due to drought-fire interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111:6347-6352.
  10. Brodribb, T. J., & Holbrook, N. M. (2003). Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiology, 132(4), 2166-2173. doi:10.1104/pp.103.023879 · DOI
  11. Brodribb, T. J., & Holbrook, N. M. (2004). Stomatal protection against hydraulic failure: a comparison of coexisting ferns and angiosperms. New Phytologist, 162(3), 663-670. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01060.x · DOI
  12. Brodribb, T. J., Holbrook, N. M., Edwards, E. J., & Gutierrez, M. V. (2003). Relations between stomatal closure, leaf turgor and xylem vulnerability in eight tropical dry forest trees. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26(3), 443-450. doi:doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00975.x Accepted Article · DOI
  13. Brodribb, T. J., Skelton, R. P., McAdam, S. A. M., Bienaime, D., Lucani, C. J., & Marmottant, P. (2016). Visual quantification of embolism reveals leaf vulnerability to hydraulic failure. New Phytol. doi:10.1111/nph.13846 · DOI
  14. Burton, C., Rifai, S., & Malhi, Y. (2018). Inter-comparison and assessment of gridded climate products over tropical forests during the 2015/2016 El Nino. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 373(1760), 10. doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0406 · DOI
  15. Castro, S. M., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A., & Sato, H. (2018). Effect of drought on productivity in a Costa Rican tropical dry forest. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4), 045001.
  16. Choat, B., Brodribb, T. J., Brodersen, C. R., Duursma, R. A., López, R., & Medlyn, B. E. (2018). Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature, 558(7711), 531-539. doi:10.1038/s41586- 018-0240-x · DOI
  17. Cooley, S. S., Williams, C. A., Fisher, J. B., Halverson, G. H., Perret, J., & Lee, C. M. (2019). Assessing regional drought impacts on vegetation and evapotranspiration: a case study in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Ecological Applications, 29(2), e01834. doi:10.1002/eap.1834 · DOI
  18. Esquivel-Muelbert, A., Galbraith, D., Dexter, K. G., Baker, T. R., Lewis, S. L., Meir, P., . . . Phillips, O. L. (2017). Biogeographic distributions of neotropical trees reflect their directly measured drought tolerances. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 8334. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08105-8 · DOI
  19. Feng, X., Porporato, A., & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2013). Changes in rainfall seasonality in the tropics. Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 811-815. doi:10.1038/nclimate1907 Accepted Article · DOI
  20. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). Companion to Applied Regression (Second ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  21. Greenwood, S., Ruiz-Benito, P., Martínez-Vilalta, J., Lloret, F., Kitzberger, T., Allen, C. D., . . . Jump, A. S. (2017). Tree mortality across biomes is promoted by drought intensity, lower wood density and higher specific leaf area. Ecology Letters, 20(4), 539-553. doi:10.1111/ele.12748 · DOI
  22. Hartshorn, G. S. (1983). Plants. In D. H. Janzen (Ed.), Costa Rican natural history (pp. 118-157). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  23. Johnson, M. O., Galbraith, D., Gloor, M., De Deurwaerder, H., Guimberteau, M., Rammig, A., . . . Baker, T. R. (2016). Variation in stem mortality rates determines patterns of above-ground biomass in Amazonian forests: implications for dynamic global vegetation models. Global Change Biology, 22(12), 3996-4013. doi:doi:10.1111/gcb.13315 · DOI
  24. Karger, D. N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R. W., . . . Kessler, M. (2017). Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Scientific Data, 4, 170122. doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.122 · DOI
  25. Martin-StPaul, N., Delzon, S., & Cochard, H. (2017). Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure. Ecology Letters, 20(11), 1437-1447. doi:doi:10.1111/ele.12851 · DOI
  26. Messier, J., McGill, B. J., Enquist, B. J., & Lechowicz, M. J. (2017). Trait variation and integration across scales: is the leaf economic spectrum present at local scales? Ecography, 40(6), 685- 697. doi:10.1111/ecog.02006 · DOI
  27. McDowell,N., D., A. C., Kristina, A.-T., Paulo, B., Roel, B., Jeff, C., . . . Xiangtao, X. (2018). Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests. New Phytologist, 219(3), 851-869. doi:doi:10.1111/nph.15027 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Millar, C. I., & Stephenson, N. L. (2015). Temperate forest health in an era of emerging megadisturbance. Science, 349(6250), 823-826. doi:10.1126/science.aaa9933 · DOI
  29. Muggeo, V. M. R. (2008). segmented: an R Package to Fit Regression Models with Broken-Line Relationships. R News, 8(1), 20-25.
  30. O'Brien, M. J., Aviles, D. P., & Powers, J. S. (2018). Resilience of seed production to a severe El Niño-induced drought across functional groups and dispersal types. Global Change Biology, 24(11), 5270-5280. doi:doi:10.1111/gcb.14416 · DOI
  31. Peng, C., Ma, Z., Lei, X., Zhu, Q., Chen, H., Wang, W., . . . Zhou, X. (2011). A drought-induced pervasive increase in tree mortality across Canada's boreal forests. Nature Climate Change, 1, 467. doi:10.1038/nclimate1293 Accepted Article https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1293#supplementary-information · DOI
  32. Phillips, O. L., Aragao, L., Lewis, S. L., Fisher, J. B., Lloyd, J., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., . . . Torres- Lezama, A. (2009). Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science, 323(5919), 1344- 1347. doi:10.1126/science.1164033 · DOI
  33. Phillips, O. L., van der Heijden, G., Lewis, S. L., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Aragao, L., Lloyd, J., . . . Vilanova, E. (2010). Drought-mortality relationships for tropical forests. New Phytologist, 187(3), 631-646. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03359.x · DOI
  34. Powers, J. S., Becknell, J. M., Irving, J., & Perez-Aviles, D. (2009). Diversity and structure of regenerating tropical dry forests in Costa Rica: geographic patterns and environmental drivers Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 959-970. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.036 · DOI
  35. Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Ciais, P., Frank, D., Mahecha, M. D., Seneviratne, S. I., . . . Wattenbach, M. (2013). Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature, 500, 287. doi:10.1038/nature12350 · DOI
  36. Rodriguez-Dominguez, C. M., Carins Murphy, M. R., Lucani, C., & Brodribb, T. J. (2018). Mapping xylem failure in disparate organs of whole plants reveals extreme resistance in olive roots. New Phytologist, 218(3), 1025-1035. doi:10.1111/nph.15079 · DOI
  37. Rowland, L., da Costa, A. C. L., Galbraith, D. R., Oliveira, R. S., Binks, O. J., Oliveira, A. A. R., . . . Meir, P. (2015). Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation. Nature, 528, 119. doi:10.1038/nature15539 · DOI
  38. Sala, A., Piper, F., & Hoch, G. (2010). Physiological mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality are far from being resolved. New Phytologist, 186(2), 274-281. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1469- 8137.2009.03167.x · DOI
  39. Skelton, R. P., Brodribb, T. J., & Choat, B. (2017). Casting light on xylem vulnerability in an herbaceous species reveals a lack of segmentation. New Phytologist, 214(2), 561-569. doi:10.1111/nph.14450 · DOI
  40. Smith-Martin, C. M., X. Xu, D. Medvigy, S. A. Schnitzer, and J. S. Powers. (2019) Allometric scaling laws linking biomass and rooting depth vary across ontogeny and functional groups in tropical dry forest lianas and trees. New Phytologist, doi.org/10.1111/nph.16275. Accepted Article · DOI
  41. Sperry, J. S., Wang, Y., Wolfe, B. T., Mackay, D. S., Anderegg, W. R. L., McDowell, N. G., & Pockman, W. T. (2016). Pragmatic hydraulic theory predicts stomatal responses to climatic water deficits. New Phytologist, 212(3), 577-589. doi:doi:10.1111/nph.14059 · DOI
  42. Stephenson, N. L., A. J. Das, N. J. Ampersee, B. M. Bulaon, and J. L. Yee. 2019. Which trees die during drought? The key role of insect host-tree selection. Journal of Ecolog,107, 2383-2401.
  43. Trugman, A. T., Detto, M., Bartlett, M. K., Medvigy, D., Anderegg, W. R. L., Schwalm, C., . . . Pacala, S. W. (2018). Tree carbon allocation explains forest drought-kill and recovery patterns. Ecology Letters, 21(10), 1552-1560. doi:doi:10.1111/ele.13136 · DOI
  44. Tyree, M. T., & Hammel, H. T. (1972). The measurement of the turgor pressure and the water relations of plants by the pressure-bomb technique. Journal of Experimental Botany, 23(1), 267-282. doi:10.1093/jxb/23.1.267 · DOI
  45. Uriarte, M., Schwartz, N., Powers, J. S., Marín-Spiotta, E., Liao, W., & Werden, L. K. (2016). Impacts of climate variability on tree demography in second growth tropical forests: the importance of regional context for predicting successional trajectories. Biotropica, 48(6), 780- 797. doi:10.1111/btp.12380 · DOI
  46. Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S (Fourth ed.). New York: Springer.
  47. Waring, B. G., Adams, R., Branco, S., & Powers, J. S. (2016). Scale-dependent variation in nitrogen cycling and soil fungal communities along gradients of forest composition and age in regenerating tropical dry forests. New Phytologist, 209(2), 845-854. doi:10.1111/nph.13654 · DOI
  48. Werden, L. K., Becknell, J. M., & Powers, J. S. (2018). Edaphic factors, successional status and functional traits drive habitat associations of trees in naturally regenerating tropical dry forests. Functional Ecology, 32(0), 2766-2776. doi:doi:10.1111/1365-2435.13206 · DOI
  49. Wolfe, B. T., Sperry, J. S., & Kursar, T. A. (2016). Does leaf shedding protect stems from cavitation during seasonal droughts? A test of the hydraulic fuse hypothesis. New Phytologist, 212(4), 1007-1018. doi:doi:10.1111/nph.14087 Accepted Article · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powers, J. S., Vargas G., G., Brodribb, T. J., Schwartz, N. B., Pérez‐Aviles, D., Smith‐Martin, C. M., Becknell, J. M., Aureli, F., Blanco, R., Calderón‐Morales, E., Calvo‐Alvarado, J. C., Calvo‐Obando, A. J., Chavarría, M. M., Carvajal‐Vanegas, D., Jiménez‐Rodríguez, C. D., Murillo Chacon, E., Schaffner, C. M., Werden, L. K., Xu, X., & Medvigy, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of Minnesota St. Paul MN USA
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Department of Ecology, Evolution, & Behavior University of Minnesota St. Paul MN USA
  • Colby College (US)
  • Universidad Veracruzana (MX)
  • Guanacaste Conservation Area (CR)
  • Escuela de Ingeniería Forestal, Tecnológico de Costa Rica Cartago Costa Rica
  • Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica (CR)
  • Programa de Investigación Área de Conservación Guanacaste Sistema Nacional de Areas de Conservación Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía Liberia Costa Rica
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Powers, Jennifer S.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-03-21
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
3122-3133
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W3006174963
Cited by
216
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 16
FWCI
13.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Chester Zoo
  • National Geographic Society
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0014363)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
drought-induced tree mortality, hydraulic vulnerability, hydraulic safety margin, leaf economics spectrum, functional traits, tropical dry forest, climate change
MeSH terms
Costa Rica, Tropical Climate, Plant Leaves, Droughts, El Nino-Southern Oscillation, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review