Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Will among‐population variation in seed traits improve the chance of species persistence under climate change?

Open access
Cochrane, Anne, Yates, Colin J., Hoyle, Gemma L., Nicotra, Adrienne B.·2015·Global Ecology and Biogeography

Abstract

Aim: Seed traits related to recruitment have direct relevance for plant fitness and persistence. Trait variation in time and among populations may increase species resilience and ultimately reduce the risk of extinction. However, patterns of among‐population variation in critical recruitment traits remain poorly known and are often disregarded when considering extinction risk under future climates. Location: Global. Methods: In this paper we review and synthesize current knowledge about among‐population variation in physiological and morphological traits related to plant recruitment. We outline the consequences of that variation for species persistence under climate change, and discuss the implications for conservation, management and restoration. Results: The evaluated studies provide compelling evidence that among‐population variation in traits underpinning seedling emergence, growth and establishment is widespread. Contrary to expectations, environmental gradients do not appear to be reliable predictors of variation among populations and responses are often individualistic. Likewise, well‐established cross‐species patterns are not consistently reflected among populations within a species. As the pattern of this variation is unpredictable, we cannot make simple generalizations about how this variation is allocated across geographic ranges or the extent of environmental versus fixed genetic differences. Nor do these patterns clearly elucidate the potential for this variation to mitigate negative effects of climate change. Main conclusions: If we ignore among‐population variation in seed traits, or assume it will follow simple environmental clines, we do so at our own peril. The consequences of such an approach are likely to include biased forecasts of future range dynamics, hindering identification of the genetic material most appropriate for conservation, restoration and management. Further research that integrates ecology and emerging evolutionary genetic techniques to identify the distribution of seed traits within foundation species and the mechanisms driving them is urgently required to guide the management and maintenance of systems in the face of rapidly changing climates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/geb.12234

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 99 references

Metadata

Authors
Cochrane, A., Yates, C. J., Hoyle, G. L., & Nicotra, A. B.
Venue
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-10
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
12-24
ISSN
  • 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-8238
OpenAlex
W1557624815
Cited by
258
References
99
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Will among‐population variation in seed traits improve the chance of species persistence under climate change? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/geb.12234
The paper
Cochrane, A., Yates, C. J., Hoyle, G. L., & Nicotra, A. B. (2015). Will among‐population variation in seed traits improve the chance of species persistence under climate change? Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12234

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.