Cited by 26Digital Platforms and EconomicsGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactDigital Transformation in Industry

Emerging positions of German firms in the industrial internet of things: A global technological ecosystem perspective

Open access
Lechowski, Grzegorz, Krzywdzinski, Martin·2022·Global Networks

Abstract

The industrial internet of things (IIoT) has created entirely new inter‐firm competitive and collaborative dynamics that focus on the supply of digital infrastructures, services and platforms for industrial users. These dynamics typically involve machinery builders, information technology suppliers and traditional technology buyers from various asset‐intensive sectors. Given the global character of IIoT technology, transnationally relevant inter‐firm arrangements have emerged for which we still lack a conceptually grounded understanding. This study addresses this research gap from the German perspective by combining the concepts of global value chains and complex technical systems. Empirically, we develop a multiple case study of established German firms that have provided IIoT technologies in the domain of ‘smart manufacturing.’ We investigate the firms’ evolving positions within the multi‐layered IIoT stack and explore their technological dependency on global cloud‐infrastructure suppliers. Second, we put the case study into the context of the recent German industrial‐policy initiatives related to the discourse of ‘digital sovereignty’, which attempt to improve the positions of domestic actors vis‐à‐vis the multi‐national tech companies. Conceptually, this study offers the framework of global technological ecosystems as a new perspective on the transnational platform economy, which highlights the enabling character of global‐scale digital infrastructures and acknowledges active involvement of non‐firm actors in ecosystem governance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/glob.12380

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 247TailorSteel effectively implements IIoT in its fully automated factory, with 125 employees, a 30 million euro turnover in 2014, and 25-30% annual growth.

    “247Tai-lorSteel, an SME, effectively implements IIoT in its fully automated factory [28].”

    From A Critical Overview of Industrial Internet of Things Security and Privacy Issues Using a Layer-Based Hacking Scenario (2023) · cites this paper as [28]

    The passages on manufacturing-technology specialists and IIoT infrastructure discuss other firms and smart-manufacturing systems, but do not identify 247TailorSteel or describe its factory. Searches for the company name and the stated employee, turnover, and growth figures found no passage addressing those details. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Belton, K. B., Audretsch, D. B., Graham, J. D., & Rupp, J. A. (2019). Who will set the rules for smart factories? Issues in Science and Technology, 35(3), 70-76.
  2. Hübner, I. (2017). Große Cloud-Player und ihre Machine-Learning-Strategien von. In C. Manzei, L. Schleupner, & R. Heinze (Eds.), Industrie 4.0 im internationalen Kontext: Kernkonzepte, Ergebnisse, Trends (pp. 169-175). Beuth Verlag.
  3. Humphrey, J. (2019). Platforms, Value Chains and Governance: Do Platforms Need a New Theory? Paper presented at the SASE Conference 2019, The New School, New York City.
  4. Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61-69.
  5. Sinsel, A. (2019). Das Internet der Dinge in der Produktion: Smart Manufacturing für Anwender und Lösungsanbieter. Springer- Verlag.
  6. Soldatos, J., Kaldis, J., Teixeira, T., Gezer, V., & Malo, P. (2019). Ecosystems for digital automation solutions an overview and the edge4industry approach. In J. Soldatos, O. Lazaro, & F. Cavadini (Eds.), The digital shopfloor: industrial automation in the industry 4.0 era. Performance analysis and applications (pp. 425-446). River Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lechowski, G., & Krzywdzinski, M.
Affiliations
  • WZB Berlin Social Science Center (DE)
  • Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
Corresponding author
Lechowski, Grzegorz
Venue
Global Networks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-25
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
666-683
ISSN
  • 1470-2266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0374
OpenAlex
W4283518225
Cited by
26
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Networks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
Industrial Internet of Things, German companies, smart manufacturing, global value chains, complex technical systems, digital sovereignty, industrial policy, platform economy, ecosystem governance, inter-firm cooperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review