Cited by 17Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesNursing care and research

Perspectives of Australian family carers of people with dementia on the ‘cottage’ model of respite: Compared to traditional models of residential respite provided in aged care facilities

Open access
Harkin, Damian J., O'Connor, Claire M. C., Birch, Mary‐Rose, Poulos, Christopher J.·2020·Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract

The majority of people living with dementia reside in the community and are often reliant on the support of informal carers to do so. Family carers face many challenges in supporting the person with dementia to remain at home, and short-term respite care is a valued service that offers a temporary break from the role. Respite cottages provide short-term care in a residential home-like setting with a limited number of clients and is a more flexible approach to accessing the service. Disproportionate use of cottage respite in Australia suggests this model is preferred over traditional respite within residential aged care facility (RACF) settings, yet limited research exists to compare these models. This study sought to understand the perceptions of carers who had used cottage respite in comparison to other models, and explore the contribution of cottage respite for supporting carers to continue in their role and maintain their care recipient (CR) living at home. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 126 family carers who had used one of two New South Wales-based respite cottages within a 2-year period; 67 of whom had also used RACF respite. Thematic analysis revealed four main themes around the benefits of cottage respite: (a) an effective essential service, (b) flexibility, (c) familiarity and (d) appropriateness, especially for early stage or younger onset dementia. Carers indicated that the more homely, familiar and intimate cottage model of respite care was preferential to that of the larger, institutional-style RACF respite setting. Carers credited the cottage model of respite service with delaying their need for permanent residential placement by over 12 months. The cottage respite model provides an important avenue to supporting the individual needs of dementia dyads, with potential to delay permanent placement, and should be offered more broadly to provide people with more choice about their care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hsc.12916

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harkin, D. J., O'Connor, C. M. C., Birch, M., & Poulos, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Positive Ageing HammondCare Sydney NSW Australia
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Poulos, Christopher J.
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
850-861
ISSN
  • 0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2524
OpenAlex
W2996200003
Cited by
17
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
HammondCare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
dementia, family caregivers, respite care, residential aged care facilities, home care, caregiver perceptions, early-stage dementia, early-onset dementia, care choice
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Australia, Dementia, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Male, New South Wales, Respite Care, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review