Cited by 52Avian ecology and behaviorMarine animal studies overviewMarine and fisheries research

Age‐specific survival and movement among major African Penguin Spheniscus demersus colonies

Sherley, Richard B., Abadi, Fitsum, Ludynia, Katrin, Barham, Barbara J., Clark, Allan E., Altwegg, Res·2014·Ibis

Abstract

Reliable estimates of survival and dispersal are crucial to understanding population dynamics, but for seabirds, in which some individuals spend years away from land, mortality and emigration are often confounded. Multistate mark–recapture methods reduce bias by incorporating movement into the process of estimating survival. We used a multistate model to provide unbiased age‐specific survival and movement probabilities for the Endangered African PenguinSpheniscus demersusbased on 5281 nestlings and 31 049 adults flipper‐banded and resighted in the Western Cape, South Africa, between 1994 and 2012. Adult survival was initially high (≥ 0.74) but declined after 2003–2004 coincident with a reduction in the availability of SardineSardinops sagaxand AnchovyEngraulis encrasicoluson the west coast of South Africa. Juvenile survival was poorly estimated, but was lower and more variable than adult survival. Fidelity to the locality of origin varied over time, but was high in adults at Robben and Dassen islands (≥ 0.88) and above 0.55 for juvenile and immature Penguins at all localities. Movement occurred predominantly during 1994–2003 and was indicative of immigration to Robben and Dassen islands. Our results confirm that a prolonged period of adult mortality contributed to the observed decline in the African Penguin population and suggest a need for approaches operating over large spatial scales to ensure food security for marine top predators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ibi.12189

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherley, R. B., Abadi, F., Ludynia, K., Barham, B. J., Clark, A. E., & Altwegg, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Sherley, Richard B.
Venue
Ibis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-22
Volume
156
Issue
4
Pages
716-728
ISSN
  • 0019-1019 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-919X
OpenAlex
W2024253035
Cited by
52
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ibis (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation (85802)
  • Claude Leon Foundation
  • BirdLife South Africa
  • Leiden Conservation Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
African penguin, Spheniscus demersus, age-specific survival, dispersal, seabird population decline, juvenile survival, immigration, Robben Island, Dassen Island, Western Cape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review