Cited by 74Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Influence of DOAC Stop on coagulation assays in samples from patients on rivaroxaban or apixaban

Platton, Sean, Hunt, Christina·2019·International Journal of Laboratory Hematology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) require no laboratory monitoring, but they interfere with almost all clotting tests to a varying degree, depending on the DOAC, assay principles and reagents used. DOAC Stop (Haematex Research, Sydney, Australia) has recently been shown to adsorb DOACs from spiked and patient plasmas. The aim of our work was to investigate the DOAC Stop effect on a range of haemostasis assays on plasmas collected from patients on rivaroxaban or apixaban, to see whether it removes the effect of these drugs to enable more accurate interpretation of coagulation assays. METHODS: Samples from patients anticoagulated with either rivaroxaban, apixaban or no anticoagulant were tested for prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), DOAC-specific anti-Xa assay, factor VIII (one-stage and chromogenic assay) and DRVVT (low and high phospholipid) before and after sample treatment with DOAC-Stop. RESULTS: DOAC Stop significantly removed the effects of rivaroxaban and apixaban on PT, APTT, anti-Xa activity, factor VIII (one-stage and chromogenic assays), and DRVVT (low and high phospholipid reagents), and reduced the number of false positive of lupus anticoagulant interpretations in patients on rivaroxaban. There was no effect on the results from patients that were not anticoagulated. CONCLUSION: This small study suggests that it is likely that DOAC Stop can be used in laboratories to screen for coagulopathy or lupus anticoagulants in samples containing rivaroxaban or apixaban. Care should be taken in the interpretation of results since complete reversal of the anti-Xa effect did not occur in every sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijlh.12950

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Platton, S., & Hunt, C.
Affiliations
Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Platton, Sean
Venue
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-23
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
227-233
ISSN
  • 1751-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-553X
OpenAlex
W2901796260
Cited by
74
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Laboratory Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
direct oral anticoagulants, rivaroxaban, apixaban, coagulation tests, anti-Xa activity, lupus anticoagulant, factor VIII, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, dilute Russell's viper venom time, drug interference, sample treatment
MeSH terms
Rivaroxaban, Administration, Oral, Anticoagulants, Blood Coagulation Tests, Female, Humans, Male, Pyrazoles, Pyridones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review