Cited by 57Magnesium in Health and DiseaseTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and Access

Hypomagnesaemia linked to depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cheungpasitporn, W., Thongprayoon, C., Mao, M. A., Srivali, N., Ungprasert, P., Varothai, N., Sanguankeo, A., Kittanamongkolchai, W. +1 more·2015·Internal Medicine Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reported risk of depression in patients with hypomagnesaemia is controversial. AIM: The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the association between depression and hypomagnesaemia. METHODS: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database and clinicaltrials.gov from inception through October 2014. Studies that reported odds ratios, relative risks or hazard ratios comparing the risk of depression in patients with hypomagnesaemia were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Six observational studies (three cohort studies, two cross-sectional studies and a case-control study) with a total of 19,137 patients were identified and included in the data analysis. The pooled RR of depression in patients with hypomagnesaemia was 1.34 (95% CI, 1.01-1.79, I(2) = 33%). The association between depression and hypomagnesaemia was marginally insignificant after the sensitivity analysis including only cohort and case-control studies, with a pooled RR of 1.38 (95% CI, 0.92-2.07, I(2) = 24%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a potential association between hypomagnesaemia and depression. Further studies assessing the benefits of treatment of hypomagnesaemia in patients with depression are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/imj.12682

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheungpasitporn, W., Thongprayoon, C., Mao, M. A., Srivali, N., Ungprasert, P., Varothai, N., Sanguankeo, A., Kittanamongkolchai, W., & Erickson, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
  • Siriraj Hospital (TH)
Corresponding author
Cheungpasitporn, W.
Venue
Internal Medicine Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
436-440
ISSN
  • 1444-0903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-5994
OpenAlex
W1955927122
Cited by
57
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Internal Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Magnesium in Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
hypomagnesemia, depression
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Humans, Magnesium Deficiency, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review