Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,140

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A CLINICAL METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE VENTILATORY RESPONSE TO CARBON DIOXIDE

READ, D. C.·1967·Australasian Annals of Medicine

Abstract

Summary: A simple method of studying the regulation of ventilation has been developed so that rapid serial observations can be made in sick patients. The method is based on the progressive increase of Pco 2 and the resulting stimulation of ventilation which occurs during rebreathing from a bag. A small bag is used in which the initial Pco 2 is close to the Pco 2 of mixed venous blood. With this technique, a Pco 2 equilibrium is rapidly established between mixed venous blood, arterial blood and end‐expiratory gas. Subsequently, parallel changes develop in end‐expiratory Pco 2 and ventilation. Under these conditions, changes in end‐expiratory Pco 2 reflect the changes of medullary chemoreceptor Pco 2 and the developing carbon dioxide stimulus. Experiments are reported which establish the linearity, reproducibility and normal range of response‐curves relating ventilation (V̇E) to end‐expiratory Pco 2. These V̇E/Pco 2 response‐lines were only slightly disturbed by simulated abnormality of the body carbon dioxide storage capacity or acute depletion of the body carbon dioxide stores. V̇E/Pco 2 response‐lines obtained by rebreathing and by the prolonged steady‐state method differed significantly in position but not in slope. The similarity in slope implies that the same proportion, Δ end‐expiratory Pco 2/Δ chemoreceptor Pco 2, is established for the two methods. The difference in position indicates a smaller Pco 2 gradient between arterial blood and chemoreceptor tissue in the rebreathing method. The method is particularly suited for clinical use, being rapid, tolerable and easily repeated. It avoids the necessity for sampling arterial or internal jugular venous blood, and can be performed by the bedside with the use of simple apparatus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/imj.1967.16.1.20

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,140

Metadata

Authors
READ, D. C.
Venue
Australasian Annals of Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1967-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
20-32
ISSN
0571-9283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2260551612
Cited by
1,140
References
0
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A CLINICAL METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE VENTILATORY RESPONSE TO CARBON DIOXIDE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/imj.1967.16.1.20
The paper
READ, D. C. (1967). A CLINICAL METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE VENTILATORY RESPONSE TO CARBON DIOXIDE. Australasian Annals of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.1967.16.1.20

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.