Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 202 of the 202 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correlates of protection against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19 disease

Open access
Goldblatt, David, Alter, Galit, Crotty, Shane, Plotkin, Stanley A.·2022·Immunological Reviews

Abstract

Antibodies against epitopes in S1 give the most accurate CoP against infection by the SARS‐CoV‐2 coronavirus. Measurement of those antibodies by neutralization or binding assays both have predictive value, with binding antibody titers giving the highest statistical correlation. However, the protective functions of antibodies are multiple. Antibodies with multiple functions other than neutralization influence efficacy. The role of cellular responses can be discerned with respect to CD4+ T cells and their augmentation of antibodies, and with respect to CD8+ cells with regard to control of viral replication, particularly in the presence of insufficient antibody. More information is needed on mucosal responses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/imr.13091

Cites

202 of 202 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 202 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Chen X, 2021, Neutralizing antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 variants induced by natural infection or vaccination: a systematic review and pooled meta‐analysis, Clin Infect Dis, 73, 1722
  2. 10.1038/s41586-021-04387-1 · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04387-1 · Paper page
  3. Tang J, 2022, Mucosal immunity against SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern including Omicron following vaccination, medRxiv
  4. 10.1101/2021.08.01.21261297 · DOI
  5. 10.1101/2021.10.18.21265113 · DOI
  6. 10.1101/2020.09.16.20196154 · DOI
  7. 10.1101/2020.07.29.20162917 · DOI
  8. 10.1101/2021.03.08.21253157 · DOI
  9. 10.3791/59400 · doi:10.3791/59400
  10. 10.1101/2021.03.30.437769 · DOI
  11. 10.1101/2021.03.23.21253885 · doi:10.1101/2021.03.23.21253885
  12. 10.1101/2021.09.16.21263686 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1101/2021.10.10.21264827 · DOI
  14. ChiuC KillingleyB MannA et al.Safety tolerability and viral kinetics during SARS‐CoV‐2 human challenge.2022. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1121993/v1 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1121993/v1
  15. 10.1101/2021.11.14.21266294 · DOI
  16. 10.1056/NEJMp2106970 · doi:10.1056/nejmp2106970

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Goldblatt, D., Alter, G., Crotty, S., & Plotkin, S. A.
Venue
Immunological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-05
Volume
310
Issue
1
Pages
6-26
ISSN
  • 0105-2896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-065X
OpenAlex
W4281843570
Cited by
298
References
202
FWCI
13.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlates of protection against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19 disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/imr.13091
The paper
Goldblatt, D., Alter, G., Crotty, S., & Plotkin, S. A. (2022). Correlates of protection against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19 disease. Immunological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.13091

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.