Development of Infant Pointing from 10 to 12 months: The Role of Relevant Caregiver Responsiveness
Abstract
Infants’ pointing frequency is a predictor of their later language abilities. Yet, predictors of pointing frequency in the first year of life are not well understood. Study 1 explored what factors in infants and caregivers at 10 months would predict the pointing frequency of infants at 12 months ( N = 35). Infant‐driven predictors were infants’ fine‐motor skills and point‐following abilities. Caregiver‐mediated predictors were caregivers’ pointing frequency and responsiveness toward infants’ pointing. Relevant caregiver responsiveness at 10 months predicted infants’ pointing frequency at 12 months, controlling for the other factors and infants’ prior pointing frequency. Study 2 explored whether child‐level factors influence caregivers’ responsiveness ( N = 49). We examined the hand shape of infants’ pointing (whole‐hand versus index‐finger) and the presence of point‐accompanying vocalizations. Infants’ vocalization‐accompanied points were more likely to elicit relevant responses from caregivers, while hand shapes played a less pronounced role. Together, the findings reveal an early emerging mutual relationship between infant pointing and caregiver behavior such that certain characteristics of infant pointing predict caregivers’ responsiveness, and relevant responsiveness toward infants’ pointing predicts the increase in infants’ pointing frequencies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caregivers' multimodal responses can reinforce infants' points.
“Ger et al. (2018) found that the proportion of caregivers' responses to infants' points that was multimodal (verbal + nonverbal) at 10 months positively predicted infants' points at 12 months, suggesting that caregivers' multimodal responses can reinforce infants' points.”
From The role of dyadic combinations of infants' behaviors and caregivers' verbal and multimodal responses in predicting vocabulary outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as Ger et al. (2018)
The proportion of caregivers' responses to infants' points that was multimodal (verbal + nonverbal) at 10 months positively predicted infants' points at 12 months.
“Ger et al. (2018) found that the proportion of caregivers' responses to infants' points that was multimodal (verbal + nonverbal) at 10 months positively predicted infants' points at 12 months, suggesting that caregivers' multimodal responses can reinforce infants' points.”
From The role of dyadic combinations of infants' behaviors and caregivers' verbal and multimodal responses in predicting vocabulary outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as Ger et al. (2018)
Cites
Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age.
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166214 · Cited by 2,727 · see citing works
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.x · Cited by 1,039 · see citing works
Self-citationTwelve‐month‐olds point to share attention and interest
Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Henning, A., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M. (2004) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00349.x · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Self-citationThe relation between pointing and language development: A meta-analysis
Colonnesi, C., Stams, G. J. J. M., Koster, I., & Noom, M. J. (2010) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2010.10.001 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Do pointing gestures by infants provoke comments from adults?
Kishimoto, T., Shizawa, Y., Yasuda, J., Hinobayashi, T., & Minami, T. (2007) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.04.001 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van der Klis, A., Adriaans, F., & Kager, R. (2023) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101828 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
van der Klis, A., Junge, C., Adriaans, F., & Kager, R. (2025) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.12626 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…by reducing referential ambiguity in unclear or novel speech, by reinforcing infants' behaviors during interactions, and/or by increasing the infants' attention to toys (e.g., Baldwin et al., 1996; Cameron‐Faulkner et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2019; Ger et al., 2018; Grassmann & Tomasello, 2010).”
- Authors
- Ger, E., Altınok, N., Liszkowski, U., & Küntay, A. C.
- Affiliations
- Koç University (TR)
- Central European University (AT)
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Department of Psychology Koç University
- Corresponding author
- Ger, Ebru
- Venue
- Infancy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-04-16
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 708-729
- ISSN
- 1525-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7078
- OpenAlex
- W2799329560
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Infancy (publishedVersion)
- Digital Collections portal (Koç University) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu (113K006)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01DL14007)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Keywords
- infant pointing, caregiver responsiveness, fine motor skills, infant vocalizations, hand shape, language development, social interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review