Cited by 567Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Twelve‐month‐olds point to share attention and interest

Open access
Liszkowski, Ulf, Carpenter, Malinda, Henning, Anne, Striano, Tricia, Tomasello, Michael·2004·Developmental Science

Abstract

Infants point for various motives. Classically, one such motive is declarative, to share attention and interest with adults to events. Recently, some researchers have questioned whether infants have this motivation. In the current study, an adult reacted to 12‐month‐olds’ pointing in different ways, and infants’ responses were observed. Results showed that when the adult shared attention and interest (i.e. alternated gaze and emoted), infants pointed more frequently across trials and tended to prolong each point – presumably to prolong the satisfying interaction. However, when the adult emoted to the infant alone or looked only to the event, infants pointed less across trials and repeated points more within trials – presumably in an attempt to establish joint attention. Results suggest that 12‐month‐olds point declaratively and understand that others have psychological states that can be directed and shared.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00349.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infants expect their caregivers to respond with gaze alternation and contingent comments to their shows + gives and points from at least 10 and 12 months of age respectively.

    “Infants expect their caregivers to respond with gaze alternation and contingent comments (i.e., joint attention) to their shows + gives and points from at least 10 and 12 months of age respectively, which suggests that infants produce these gestures with the goal to share attention and interest with others (Boundy et al., 2019; Liszkowski et al., 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Henning, A., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
Liszkowski, Ulf
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05-17
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
297-307
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2158517877
Cited by
567
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 26
FWCI
34.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
infant pointing, joint attention, gaze alternation, infant social cognition, theory of mind, 12-month-old infants, social interaction
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention, Child Development, Discrimination Learning, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Infant, Orientation, Pilot Projects, Time Factors, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review