Cited by 20Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Infants’ behaviours elicit different verbal, nonverbal, and multimodal responses from caregivers during early play

Open access
van der Klis, Anika, Adriaans, Frans, Kager, René·2023·Infant Behavior and Development

Abstract

Caregivers use a range of verbal and nonverbal behaviours when responding to their infants. Previous studies have typically focused on the role of the caregiver in providing verbal responses, while communication is inherently multimodal (involving audio and visual information) and bidirectional (exchange of information between infant and caregiver). In this paper, we present a comprehensive study of caregivers' verbal, nonverbal, and multimodal responses to 10-month-old infants' vocalisations and gestures during free play. A new coding scheme was used to annotate 2036 infant vocalisations and gestures of which 87.1 % received a caregiver response. Most caregiver responses were verbal, but 39.7 % of all responses were multimodal. We also examined whether different infant behaviours elicited different responses from caregivers. Infant bimodal (i.e., vocal-gestural combination) behaviours elicited high rates of verbal responses and high rates of multimodal responses, while infant gestures elicited high rates of nonverbal responses. We also found that the types of verbal and nonverbal responses differed as a function of infant behaviour. The results indicate that infants influence the rates and types of responses they receive from caregivers. When examining caregiver-child interactions, analysing caregivers' verbal responses alone undermines the multimodal richness and bidirectionality of early communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101828

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Klis, A., Adriaans, F., & Kager, R.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
71
Pages
101828
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321599126
Cited by
20
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
caregiver-infant interaction, caregiver responses, multimodal communication, nonverbal communication, verbal responses, infant vocalizations, infant gestures, early communication, free play, 10-month-old infants
MeSH terms
Gestures, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Caregivers, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review