Cited by 129Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Do adult mental health services identify child abuse and neglect? A systematic review.

Open access
Read, John, Harper, David, Tucker, Ian, Kennedy, Angela·2018·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Child abuse and neglect play a causal role in many mental health problems. Knowing whether users of mental health services were abused or neglected as children could be considered essential for developing comprehensive formulations and effective treatment plans. In the present study we report the findings of a systematic review, using independent searches of three databases designed to discover how often mental health staff find out whether their clients were abused or neglected as children. Twenty-one relevant studies were identified. Most people who use mental health services are never asked about child abuse or neglect. The majority of cases of child abuse or neglect are not identified by mental health services. Only 28% of abuse or neglect cases identified by researchers are found in the clients' files: emotional abuse, 44%; physical abuse, 33%; sexual abuse, 30%; emotional neglect, 17%; and physical neglect, 10%. Between 0% and 22% of mental health service users report being asked about child abuse. Men and people diagnosed with psychotic disorders are asked less than other people. Male staff ask less often than female staff. Some improvement over time was found. Policies compelling routine enquiry, training, and trauma-informed services are required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/inm.12369

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trauma and PTSD in people with psychosis often remain under-detected in mental healthcare.

    “Unfortunately, trauma and PTSD in people with psychosis often remain under-detected in mental healthcare (17, 18).”

    From Making meaning of trauma in psychosis (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Diagnosis section (page unavailable) reports that people diagnosed with psychotic disorders were less likely to have abuse or neglect recorded in initial assessments, supporting under-detection of some trauma histories. The review does not establish that PTSD itself is under-detected in people with psychosis; its PTSD comparison concerns whether abuse questions were completed for people already diagnosed with PTSD. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Anda, R., Brown, D., Felitti, V., Bremner, J., Dube, D. & Giles, W. (2007). Adversechildhood experiences and prescribed psychotropic medications in adults. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 32, 389-394.
  2. Ashmore, T., Spangaro, J. & McNamara, L. (2015). 'I was raped by Santa Claus': Responding to disclosures of sexual assault in mental health inpatient facilities. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 24, 139-148.
  3. Mathews, B. (2012). Exploring the contested role of mandatory reporting laws in the identification of severe child abuse and neglect. In: M. Freeman (Ed). Current Legal Issues: Law and Childhood Studies (pp. 302-338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Read, J. (2013). Childhood adversity and psychosis: From heresy to certainty. In: J. Read & J. Dillon (Eds). Models of Madness: Psychological, Social and Biological Approaches to Psychosis, 2nd edn. (pp. 249-275). London: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Read, J., Harper, D., Tucker, I., & Kennedy, A.
Affiliations
  • University of East London (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Read, John
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-17
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
7-19
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W2747347114
Cited by
129
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child abuse, child neglect, adult mental health services, emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, physical neglect, trauma-informed services, employee training, psychosis, mental health service users
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Humans, Mental Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review