The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Second/Foreign Language Learning as a Social Accomplishment: Elaborations on a Reconceptualized SLA
Abstract
In this article, we begin by delineating the background to and motivations behind Firth and Wagner (1997) , wherein we called for a reconceptualization of second language acquisition (SLA) research. We then outline and comment upon some of our critics' reactions to the article. Next we review and discuss the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological impact the article has had on the SLA field. Thereafter, we reengage and develop some of the themes raised but left undeveloped in the 1997 article. These themes cluster around the notions of and interrelationships between language use, language learning, and language acquisition. Although we devote space to forwarding the position that the dichotomy of languageuseandacquisitioncannot defensibly be maintained (and in this we take up a contrary position to that held in mainstream SLA), our treatment of the issues is essentially methodological. We focus on describing a variety of aspects oflearning‐in‐action, captured in transcripts of recordings of naturally occurring foreign, second, or other language interactions. Through transcript analyses, we explore the possibilities of describing learning‐in‐action devoid of cognitivistic notions of language and learning. In so doing, we advance moves to formulate and establish a reconceptualized SLA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Gumperz, J. J. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611834 · Cited by 5,861
Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom
Mehan, H. (1979) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 · Cited by 2,872
Participant Orientations in German Conversation‐for‐Learning
Kasper, G. (2004) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x · Cited by 262
Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition
Han, Z. (2004) · doi:10.21832/9781853596889 · Cited by 244
Cited by
Codemeshing in Academic Writing: Identifying Teachable Strategies of Translanguaging
CANAGARAJAH, S. (2011) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01207.x · Cited by 1,662
Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: the development of L2 grammar-for-interaction
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018) · Classroom Discourse · doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759 · Cited by 157
Yuan, Y. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2282112 · Cited by 148
Poupore, G. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168815606162 · Cited by 70
The Sociocognitive Imperative of L2 Pedagogy
Toth, P. D., & Davin, K. J. (2016) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12306 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
- Venue
- Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-29
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 800-819
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973068606
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 163.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.