The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulatory T cells in virus infections
Abstract
Summary: This review discusses situations when the magnitude and function of immune responses to virus infection are influenced by regulatory T cells (Tregs). The focus is on CD4+CD25+ forkhead box protein 3+ natural Tregs (nTregs). The immune response may be limited in magnitude and efficacy when animals with normal nTreg function are infected with virus. This limitation can be observed both in vitro and in vivo. In the case of herpes simplex virus (HSV), animals depleted of nTregs prior to infection more effectively control the virus. With some virus infections, Treg responses (either nTregs or interleukin‐10‐dependent adaptive Tregs) appear to contribute to immune dysfunction, accounting for viral persistence and chronic tissue damage. This may occur with hepatitis C virus and some retrovirus infections that include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Under other circumstances, the nTreg response is judged to be beneficial, as it may help limit the severity of tissue damage associated with an immunoinflammatory reaction to virus infection. Such a situation occurs in HSV‐induced immunopathological lesions in the eye. With HIV, nTregs may help limit chronic immune activation that may precede collapse of the immune system. This review also discusses how virus infections become recognized by nTreg responses and how such responses might be manipulated to increase immunity or to limit virus‐induced immunopathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sakaguchi, S., Sakaguchi, N., Asano, M., Itoh, M., & Toda, M. (1995) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.155.3.1151 · Cited by 5,608
Sakaguchi, S. (2005) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1178 · Cited by 2,669
Ido expression by dendritic cells: tolerance and tryptophan catabolism
Mellor, A. L., & Munn, D. H. (2004) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1457 · Cited by 2,341
A history of prostate cancer treatment.
Denmeade, S. R., & Isaacs, J. T. (2002) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc801 · Cited by 591
Cited by
Vignali, D. A. A., Collison, L. W., & Workman, C. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2343 · Cited by 3,463
Gruver, A., Hudson, L., & Sempowski, G. (2007) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.2104 · Cited by 834
Afzali, B., Lombardi, G., Lechler, R. I., & Lord, G. M. (2007) · Clinical and Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03356.x · Cited by 762
Central Role of Defective Interleukin-2 Production in the Triggering of Islet Autoimmune Destruction
Tang, Q., Adams, J. Y., Penaranda, C., Melli, K., Piaggio, E., Sgouroudis, E., Piccirillo, C. A., Salomon, B. L., & Bluestone, J. A. (2008) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.016 · Cited by 729
Factors that may impact on immunosenescence: an appraisal
Ongrádi, J., & Kövesdi, V. (2010) · Immunity & Ageing · doi:10.1186/1742-4933-7-7 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Rouse, B. T., Sarangi, P. P., & Suvas, S.
- Venue
- Immunological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07-21
- Volume
- 212
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 272-286
- ISSN
- 0105-2896 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-065X
- OpenAlex
- W2021797118
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulatory T cells in virus infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00412.x
- The paper
- Rouse, B. T., Sarangi, P. P., & Suvas, S. (2006). Regulatory T cells in virus infections. Immunological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00412.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.