Cited by 110Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Silent Child—Mothers’ Experiences Before, During, and after Stillbirth

Open access

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The quality of care received by a woman who gives birth to a dead baby is crucial for her long‐term well‐being, and limiting the period between diagnosis of intrauterine death and induction of delivery decreases her anxiety risk. The primary objective of this study was to explore why induction of delivery for most women should not be delayed more than 24 hours from the diagnosis of intrauterine death. A secondary objective was to determine how the time between diagnosis and delivery should be spent. Methods: Twelve women were interviewed about their experience before and during the diagnosis of their baby's death and the event of birth. Interviews took place 6 to 18 months after the delivery and were analyzed using a phenomenological methodology. Results: Women experienced premonition, difficulty communicating their worry, cessation of verbal communication with staff, unreality and numbing, desire to get rid of the dead child immediately, going through childbirth, and total silence. Many women believed that they were not respected as a human being during the process of diagnosing the intrauterine death. Themes emerged indicating caregivers should not reduce to zero the time between diagnosis of intrauterine death and induction of delivery. Time may be needed to obtain medical information about the delivery and to prepare the woman for meeting with and saying goodbye to her long‐awaited but now silent baby. Conclusion: The period between diagnosis of intrauterine death and induction of delivery may give health professionals a major opportunity to improve a woman's ability to cope with the event of stillbirth and prepare her to meet with her loved but now silent baby. Further clinical research can identify supportive mechanisms for parents, and sources of iatrogenic psychological trauma that should be eliminated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00304.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cullberg J., 1966, Reactions on perinatal mortality, Läkartidningen, 63, 3980
  2. Laurell‐Borulf Y., 1982, Long‐Term Adjustment After an Emotional Crisis—A Follow‐Up of Women with a Perinatal Death Infant
  3. Dahlberg K., 1997, Kvalitativa metoder för vårdvetare
  4. Tranter S, 1994, Improving management of miscarriage and stillbirth through better organisation and greater sensitivity, Mod Midwife, 5, 28

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 110

Metadata

Authors
Trulsson, O., & Rådestad, I.
Affiliations
Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Venue
Birth
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-27
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
189-195
ISSN
  • 0730-7659 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-536X
OpenAlex
W2033608754
Cited by
110
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
stillbirth, intrauterine fetal death, labor induction, maternal experience, maternal grief, psychological trauma, caregiver-patient communication, delivery time, maternal well-being
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Communication, Female, Fetal Death, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Interviews as Topic, Labor, Induced, Norway, Pregnancy, Social Support, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review