The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New‐Product Success*
Abstract
What is the relationship between market orientation and new‐product success? This important question has not been examined adequately to date because the concept of market orientation has been measured too narrowly. The concept of market orientation implies both responsive market orientation, which addresses the expressed needs of customers, and proactive market orientation, which addresses the latent needs of customers—that is, opportunities for customer value of which the customer is unaware. In the numerous market orientation–performance studies to date, the measure of market orientation has consisted virtually entirely of behaviors related to satisfying customers' expressed needs rather than satisfying their latent needs as well. The present study extends the measurement of market orientation to match the full scope of the concept—to measure both responsive market orientation and proactive market orientation. Using data from a sample of technologically diverse businesses, the present study develops a measure of proactive market orientation, refines the extant measure of responsive market orientation, and analyzes the relationship of a business's responsive and proactive market orientation to its new‐product success. The study findings imply that for any business to create and to sustain new‐product success, a responsive market orientation is not sufficient and, thus, that a proactive market orientation plays a very important positive role in a business's new‐product success. These findings make intuitive sense. For if in developing its new products a business relies solely on what customers state as their new product needs, the business is very vulnerable economically. Such a business is vulnerable not only for relying on customers' best guesses for new products, many or most of which may have little long‐term economic value for either party, but also to competitors' parallel new product responses and the inevitable resulting price competition. A business that relies solely on customers' expressed needs to develop its new products creates no new insights into value‐adding opportunities for the customer and thereby creates little or no customer dependence and foundation for customer loyalty. The important role for proactive market orientation in new‐product success is intuitively obvious—and is supported empirically in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378802500207 · Cited by 6,293
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200303 · Cited by 3,971
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
The use of lisrel in validating marketing constructs
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (1991) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/0167-8116(91)90027-5 · Cited by 1,848
Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.1.54.10121 · Cited by 1,008
Should we delight the customer?
Rust, R. T., & Oliver, R. L. (2000) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070300281008 · Cited by 712
Cited by
Hair Jr., J. F., Gabriel, M. L. D. D. S., & Patel, V. K. (2014) · Revista Brasileira de Marketing · doi:10.5585/remark.v13i2.2718 · Cited by 565
A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory
Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2010) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x · Cited by 547
Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., & Verona, G. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.021 · Cited by 494
The relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: A meta‐analysis
Grinstein, A. (2008) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560810840934 · Cited by 431
Customer value anticipation, customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical examination
Flint, D. J., Blocker, C. P., & Boutin, P. J. (2011) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.034 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., & MacLachlan, D. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 334-347
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W2080313827
- Cited by
- 1,458
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 88.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New‐Product Success*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00086.x
- The paper
- Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2004). Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New‐Product Success*. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00086.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.