Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation: The Iraq War 2003

Lewandowsky, Stephan, Stritzke, Werner G.K., Oberauer, Klaus, Morales, Michael·2005·Psychological Science

Abstract

Media coverage of the 2003 Iraq War frequently contained corrections and retractions of earlier information. For example, claims that Iraqi forces executed coalition prisoners of war after they surrendered were retracted the day after the claims were made. Similarly, tentative initial reports about the discovery of weapons of mass destruction were all later disconfirmed. We investigated the effects of these retractions and disconfirmations on people's memory for and beliefs about war-related events in two coalition countries (Australia and the United States) and one country that opposed the war (Germany). Participants were queried about (a) true events, (b) events initially presented as fact but subsequently retracted, and (c) fictional events. Participants in the United States did not show sensitivity to the correction of misinformation, whereas participants in Australia and Germany discounted corrected misinformation. Our results are consistent with previous findings in that the differences between samples reflect greater suspicion about the motives underlying the war among people in Australia and Germany than among people in the United States.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00802.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1177/0022022100031002003 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1177/01461672972311008 · DOI
  3. 10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1420 · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1420 · Paper page
  4. 10.1037//0278-7393.24.6.1483 · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.24.6.1483
  5. 10.1023/A:1024814009769 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0304-422X(98)00003-5 · doi:10.1016/s0304-422x(98)00003-5
  7. 10.1006/jmla.1996.0005 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.803 · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.803 · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80009-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/027249899391278 · doi:10.1080/027249899391278

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2005-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
190-195
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2135600606
Cited by
160
References
1
FWCI
15.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation: The Iraq War 2003. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00802.x
The paper
Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M. (2005). Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation: The Iraq War 2003. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00802.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.